Claude · Last 7 days
Claude Fable 5
0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.
Updated 2026-10-02 22:02 UTC · 2026-09-25 – 2026-10-02 UTCDiscussion overview
What the full sample discusses
All platforms · 106 eligible comments over 7 days, including usage-limit feedback; deduplicated by source and comment.
- General text · 40 comments: 15 positive / 17 negative / 8 mixed or neutral
- Reasoning · 25 comments: 20 positive / 4 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
- Usage limits · 21 comments: 3 positive / 14 negative / 4 mixed or neutral
- Coding · 13 comments: 9 positive / 4 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
Comments may cover multiple dimensions; counts are not additive or equivalent to the weighted score. Links show selected source excerpts.
Recent change
Rolling 7-day score: −11.1 points vs 7 days ago. Discussion mix can affect scores; this does not establish a cause.
Source coverage and discussion concentration
Hacker News 10 · Reddit 89 · Zhihu 7
75 identifiable discussions cover 96/106 comments; the largest has 6. Remaining thread identities are unknown; this is not a count of independent users.
Selected individual opinions
One user feels Fable still absolutely crushes web design with almost little to no inputs. One user noted that Fable 5's behavior and general capability were noticeably different between launch and its relaunch a month later.
About the sample and scores
As of 2026-10-02 22:02:03 UTC, Claude Fable 5 in the Claude family has 106 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 58.4/100. Available category scores include General text 47.5/100 (n=40); Coding 61.8/100 (n=13); Reasoning 72.6/100 (n=25). Scoring method and sources
RECENT EXPERIENCE
How the Experience Index is changing
30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.
Tap or use ← → for dates, scores and sample sizes. Blank dates have insufficient data.
Daily readings & sample sizes
| Date | Score | n | Scoring window (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 66.0 | 7 | 2026-09-25T22:02:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T22:02:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 66.0 | 7 | 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 68.2 | 8 | 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 59.1 | 7 | 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 63.8 | 16 | 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-27 | 55.9 | 19 | 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-27T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-26 | 54.0 | 18 | 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-26T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 52.0 | 20 | 2026-09-18T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 52.1 | 22 | 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-24T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 51.0 | 23 | 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 48.9 | 20 | 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 39.6 | 9 | 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-20 | 52.6 | 7 | 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-19 | 52.6 | 7 | 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 56.0 | 11 | 2026-09-11T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-09-18T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 56.4 | 9 | 2026-09-10T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 59.5 | 8 | 2026-09-09T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 49.5 | 14 | 2026-09-08T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 50.7 | 17 | 2026-09-07T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-13 | 52.5 | 20 | 2026-09-06T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-12 | 55.6 | 23 | 2026-09-05T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 54.6 | 19 | 2026-09-04T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-11T23:00:04+00:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 57.7 | 34 | 2026-09-03T23:00:05+00:00 – 2026-09-10T23:00:05+00:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 62.1 | 41 | 2026-09-02T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-09T23:00:04+00:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 62.3 | 45 | 2026-09-01T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-08T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-07 | 51.9 | 68 | 2026-08-31T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-07T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-06 | 50.8 | 64 | 2026-08-30T23:00:02+00:00 – 2026-09-06T23:00:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-05 | 49.5 | 61 | 2026-08-29T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-05T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 51.2 | 61 | 2026-08-28T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-04T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 46.1 | 46 | 2026-08-27T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-03T23:00:03+00:00 |
Hacker News · 66.0 · 7 scored comments · Read platform reviews →
ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
Across the communities
Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.
Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.
Explore long-term changes & analysis
Model lifecycle
Claude Fable 5
Released 2026-06-09 · Back to Claude
Exact-version signals observed 2026-09-21–2026-10-01 · n=197
Data window: 2026-09-04 00:00:00 to 2026-10-02 00:00:00 UTC · Scoring method: experience_score_v3.
Lifecycle updated daily · latest complete UTC day 2026-10-01
The current classification method has insufficient evidence in the original baseline window. The window is preserved; no long-term improvement or decline is inferred, and old-method scores are not compared.
- Fixed 14-day baseline
- – n=0
- Latest 28 days
- 67.3 n=165
- Change vs baseline
- –
- 90-day slope
- – pts / 30 days
14-day rolling experience
Each daily point summarizes the previous 14 complete UTC days. The dashed line is the fixed release baseline; the verdict still uses independent non-overlapping 14-day segments.
0 of 4 independent 14-day segments ready for trend judgment.
What explains the change
Experience change and discussion-mix change are separated. These are observational contributions, not proof of cause.
No category has enough samples in both windows for a contribution conclusion.
| Category | Baseline → current | Category change | Weight share | Experience contribution | Discussion-mix contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 18 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Image generation | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 0 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Image understanding | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 0 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Local deploy | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 0 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Reasoning | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 58 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Roleplay / creative | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 3 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Safety & refusals | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 5 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Speed & latency | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 15 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| General text | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 70 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Video generation | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 0 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
Lifecycle scores use the same experience-signal weights as the main index, without sample shrinkage after n=30. They measure public user perception, not model capability or backend causes.
Community reviews
Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.
0 selected excerpts
Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.
Comment context
But any human knows when you dip your left wing down, (the right wing up) - you are banking to the left. As the plane nose goes to the left we expect to see the ground slide past the window from left to right. My local model (Qwen 3.8 27b) got it wrong and had the ground slide from right to left - exactly backwards. I bumped the project up to Sonnet, Opus and eventually Fable. None of them could fix it.
Comment context
when I use fable for 2 minutes 5% of my weekly max usage is gone lol
Comment context
Comparing with the Claude 100$ - I was still getting way more value in terms of usage and almost always never ran out of usage by alternating between Fable 5 and Opus 5.
Show original
fable 那时候名正言顺的糊弄我女友论文的原理基础,说的她叹服觉得 fable 好厉害,结果 GPT5.6Sol 和 fable 对峙立马原形毕露
Comment context
But Claude $20 still gave vastly more usage on Fable release than Codex $20 for Astra release.
Comment context
Hopefully they don't join the other trend of making the models super censored w all these classifiers.
No selected comments for this filter in the last 7 days.