Claude · Last 7 days
Claude Sonnet 5.5
0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.
Updated 2026-10-03 17:47 UTC · 2026-09-26 – 2026-10-03 UTCDiscussion overview
What the full sample discusses
All platforms · 135 eligible comments over 7 days, including usage-limit feedback; deduplicated by source and comment.
- General text · 66 comments: 45 positive / 20 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
- Reasoning · 30 comments: 21 positive / 7 negative / 2 mixed or neutral
- Speed & latency · 25 comments: 18 positive / 6 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
- Usage limits · 11 comments: 3 positive / 6 negative / 2 mixed or neutral
Comments may cover multiple dimensions; counts are not additive or equivalent to the weighted score. Links show selected source excerpts.
Recent change
Recent change: not enough history to assess improvement or decline.
Source coverage and discussion concentration
Hacker News 4 · Reddit 70 · Zhihu 61
50 identifiable discussions cover 131/135 comments; the largest has 51. Remaining thread identities are unknown; this is not a count of independent users.
Selected individual opinions
One user says Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 are great models. One user had Claude Sonnet 5.5 hide the entire mod bar (failing to render it) when making code changes.
About the sample and scores
As of 2026-10-03 17:47:03 UTC, Claude Sonnet 5.5 in the Claude family has 135 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 66.2/100. Available category scores include General text 65.0/100 (n=66); Coding 75.8/100 (n=10); Reasoning 68.5/100 (n=30). Scoring method and sources
RECENT EXPERIENCE
How the Experience Index is changing
30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.
Tap or use ← → for dates, scores and sample sizes. Blank dates have insufficient data.
Daily readings & sample sizes
| Date | Score | n | Scoring window (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-03 | 67.7 | 65 | 2026-09-26T17:47:03+00:00 – 2026-10-03T17:47:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 67.7 | 60 | 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 66.3 | 57 | 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 66.9 | 48 | 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 63.8 | 41 | 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00 |
Reddit · 67.7 · 65 scored comments · Read platform reviews →
ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
Across the communities
Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.
Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.
Explore long-term changes & analysis
This version is not yet tracked since release; recent 7-day experience is shown above.
Community reviews
Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.
1 selected excerpts
Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.
Show original
目前免费最强还是Sonnet5.5吧
Show original
我觉得这就是个代餐
Comment context
Honestly, I think this is just a substitute. Because Opus 5.5 is too excellent, both in price and capability, and my personal usage isn't that extensive, so it's also great to delegate all my current work to Opus 5.5. There's no need to pay attention to Sonnet anymore.
Machine translatedShow original
说实话，我觉得这就是个代餐。因为opus 5.5过于优秀，无论是价格还是能力，我自己用量也没大到那种程度，所以我现在的工作全部都交给opus 5.5也很香，也就没必要再关注sonnet了。
Comment context
I learned through my testing that sonnet 5.5 sometimes spawns opus 5.5 subagents. Might be one of the main reasons why sonnet 5.5 feels a lot more expensive for people.
And, this is not about the API price, but the percentage weekly usage of the subscription.
Comment context
I actually added a mini router in front of it this week, and the harder slices get dispatched to sonnet 5.5 instead, pretty effective so far, it improved first-pass implementation quality.
Show original
丫抠字儿太快了 找她吹牛逼容易跟不上思路
Show original
而且很快
Show original
依靠无限制拉长思考来换取所谓的更高智商，感觉可能不是正确方向
Show original
追问，发现有幻觉
Comment context
I discussed a JEV-related question and found that Company A's models now have a certain characteristic.
Machine translatedShow original
我拿一个跟JEV相关的问题讨论了一下，发现A家的模型现在有个特点。
Show original
在智能体命令行编程测试 Terminal-Bench 4.0 中，它以 70.6% 的高分拿下 全球第一 ，相比 Sonnet 5 的 10.3% 属于跨越式暴涨
Show original
A社的账号"娇贵"啊，隔三岔五给你大陆ip全干挺了
Show original
才发现Sonnet5.5还挺耐用啊
Show original
思考用更多token导致更慢
Show original
免费用户也能用几下sonnet5.5，反观隔壁免费用户只能用luna
Show original
同思考档位的sonnet 5.5 比 opus 消耗token更多，效率更低
Show original
单价只有Opus一半，额度还给得更多，还学会了O社时不时发重置次数
Comment context
I've never once hit a safeguard refusal. Dunno what you guys are doing
Comment context
If Astra is that great, how come its code introduces so many bugs? Give Astra a complicated task on Ultra, and then after give the prompt "review" - you will get about 5 problems.
Comment context
Tokens | cost to serve/run the same agentic task | performance across multiple benchmarks
No selected comments for this filter in the last 7 days.