GPT · Last 7 days
GPT-5.6 Sol
0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.
Updated 2026-10-04 07:52 UTC · 2026-09-27 – 2026-10-04 UTCDiscussion overview
What the full sample discusses
All platforms · 91 eligible comments over 7 days, including usage-limit feedback; deduplicated by source and comment.
- General text · 44 comments: 19 positive / 23 negative / 2 mixed or neutral
- Reasoning · 17 comments: 11 positive / 6 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
- Usage limits · 12 comments: 1 positive / 10 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
- Coding · 10 comments: 4 positive / 4 negative / 2 mixed or neutral
Comments may cover multiple dimensions; counts are not additive or equivalent to the weighted score. Links show selected source excerpts.
Recent change
Rolling 7-day score: −2.4 points vs 7 days ago. Discussion mix can affect scores; this does not establish a cause.
Source coverage and discussion concentration
Hacker News 8 · Reddit 68 · RedNote 1 · Zhihu 14
44 identifiable discussions cover 83/91 comments; the largest has 10. Remaining thread identities are unknown; this is not a count of independent users.
Selected individual opinions
One user still uses GPT-5.6 Sol in their custom Codex coding harness One user tested GPT-5.6 Sol on the "Three-color Garden" problem, but it could not solve it, whereas GPT-6 Astra solved it in about 30 minutes.
About the sample and scores
As of 2026-10-04 07:52:04 UTC, GPT-5.6 Sol in the GPT family has 91 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 48.6/100. Available category scores include General text 47.1/100 (n=44); Coding 49.8/100 (n=10); Reasoning 56.5/100 (n=17). Scoring method and sources
RECENT EXPERIENCE
How the Experience Index is changing
30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.
Tap or use ← → for dates, scores and sample sizes. Blank dates have insufficient data.
Daily readings & sample sizes
| Date | Score | n | Scoring window (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-04 | 53.8 | 7 | 2026-09-27T07:52:04+00:00 – 2026-10-04T07:52:04+00:00 |
| 2026-10-03 | 53.8 | 7 | 2026-09-26T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-03T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 53.8 | 7 | 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 55.0 | 9 | 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 55.0 | 9 | 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 56.0 | 7 | 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 52.5 | 5 | 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-27 | 50.3 | 6 | 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-27T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-26 | 50.3 | 6 | 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-26T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 47.6 | 6 | 2026-09-18T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 43.3 | 5 | 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-24T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 38.1 | 7 | 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 35.3 | 8 | 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 32.8 | 7 | 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-20 | 37.3 | 5 | 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-19 | 39.9 | 7 | 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 43.4 | 6 | 2026-09-11T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-09-18T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 43.4 | 6 | 2026-09-10T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 44.9 | 7 | 2026-09-09T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 44.5 | 9 | 2026-09-08T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 41.9 | 9 | 2026-09-07T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-13 | 41.9 | 9 | 2026-09-06T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-12 | 39.4 | 7 | 2026-09-05T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 39.4 | 7 | 2026-09-04T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-11T23:00:04+00:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 36.8 | 8 | 2026-09-03T23:00:05+00:00 – 2026-09-10T23:00:05+00:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 48.2 | 10 | 2026-09-02T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-09T23:00:04+00:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 55.5 | 8 | 2026-09-01T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-08T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-07 | 62.2 | 10 | 2026-08-31T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-07T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-06 | 62.2 | 10 | 2026-08-30T23:00:02+00:00 – 2026-09-06T23:00:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-05 | 62.2 | 10 | 2026-08-29T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-05T23:00:03+00:00 |
Hacker News · 53.8 · 7 scored comments · Read platform reviews →
ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
Across the communities
Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.
Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.
Explore long-term changes & analysis
Model lifecycle
GPT-5.6 Sol
Released 2026-07-10 · Back to GPT
Exact-version signals observed 2026-09-23–2026-10-03 · n=173
Data window: 2026-09-06 00:00:00 to 2026-10-04 00:00:00 UTC · Scoring method: experience_score_v3.
Lifecycle updated daily · latest complete UTC day 2026-10-03
The current classification method has insufficient evidence in the original baseline window. The window is preserved; no long-term improvement or decline is inferred, and old-method scores are not compared.
- Fixed 14-day baseline
- – n=0
- Latest 28 days
- 53.2 n=147
- Change vs baseline
- –
- 90-day slope
- – pts / 30 days
14-day rolling experience
Each daily point summarizes the previous 14 complete UTC days. The dashed line is the fixed release baseline; the verdict still uses independent non-overlapping 14-day segments.
0 of 4 independent 14-day segments ready for trend judgment.
What explains the change
Experience change and discussion-mix change are separated. These are observational contributions, not proof of cause.
No category has enough samples in both windows for a contribution conclusion.
| Category | Baseline → current | Category change | Weight share | Experience contribution | Discussion-mix contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 14 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Image generation | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 0 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Image understanding | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 0 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Local deploy | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 0 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Reasoning | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 35 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Roleplay / creative | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 3 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Safety & refusals | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 4 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Speed & latency | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 13 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| General text | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 82 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
| Video generation | Baseline → currentnot enough datan=0 → 0 | Category change– | Weight share– | Experience contribution– | Discussion-mix contribution– |
Lifecycle scores use the same experience-signal weights as the main index, without sample shrinkage after n=30. They measure public user perception, not model capability or backend causes.
Community reviews
Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.
0 selected excerpts
Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.
Show original
把所有任务全换回5.6 Sol了
Show original
GPT 5.6 Sol 做过三色花园这个问题,但是它并做不出来
Show original
多模态水平很不错,暴打GPT 5.6 Sol的建模
Show original
METR的评估报告说,被查出的GPT-5.6 Sol作弊率高于其评测过的任何公开模型,频繁到「令能力测量失去可靠性」,还存在「作弊和掩盖不当行为」的倾向
No selected comments for this filter in the last 7 days.