GPT · Last 7 days
GPT-6 Luna
0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.
Updated 2026-10-03 06:32 UTC · 2026-09-26 – 2026-10-03 UTCDiscussion overview
What the full sample discusses
All platforms · 70 eligible comments over 7 days, including usage-limit feedback; deduplicated by source and comment.
- General text · 35 comments: 12 positive / 20 negative / 3 mixed or neutral
- Speed & latency · 18 comments: 10 positive / 7 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
- Coding · 9 comments: 3 positive / 6 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
- Usage limits · 6 comments: 4 positive / 2 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
Comments may cover multiple dimensions; counts are not additive or equivalent to the weighted score. Links show selected source excerpts.
Recent change
Rolling 7-day score: −0.1 points vs 7 days ago. Discussion mix can affect scores; this does not establish a cause.
Source coverage and discussion concentration
Hacker News 8 · Reddit 34 · Zhihu 28
37 identifiable discussions cover 62/70 comments; the largest has 16. Remaining thread identities are unknown; this is not a count of independent users.
Selected individual opinions
One user uses GPT-6 Luna as an agent at Low-Max effort for implementation or research. One user asked GPT-6 Luna to use computer use to solve a problem, but it stubbornly refused despite repeated reminders
About the sample and scores
As of 2026-10-03 06:32:03 UTC, GPT-6 Luna in the GPT family has 70 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 41.9/100. Available category scores include General text 40.7/100 (n=35); Coding 40.4/100 (n=9); Reasoning 53.0/100 (n=5). Scoring method and sources
RECENT EXPERIENCE
How the Experience Index is changing
30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.
Tap or use ← → for dates, scores and sample sizes. Blank dates have insufficient data.
Daily readings & sample sizes
| Date | Score | n | Scoring window (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-03 | 53.7 | 8 | 2026-09-26T06:32:03+00:00 – 2026-10-03T06:32:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 53.7 | 8 | 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 53.7 | 8 | 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 53.7 | 8 | 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 55.5 | 12 | 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 49.7 | 7 | 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-27 | 46.0 | 6 | 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-27T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-26 | 46.0 | 6 | 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-26T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | — | 4 | 2026-09-18T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | — | 4 | 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-24T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | — | 4 | 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 |
Hacker News · 53.7 · 8 scored comments · Read platform reviews →
ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
Across the communities
Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.
Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.
Explore long-term changes & analysis
This version is not yet tracked since release; recent 7-day experience is shown above.
Community reviews
Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.
0 selected excerpts
Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.
Show original
GPT-6 Luna 得分为 66.6%,接近 Opus 5 和 Fable 5 的 medium effort,单任务成本则低约 93% 和 96%
Comment context
Software engineering benchmarks tell a clearer story. In DeepSWE v1.1, GPT-6 Sol's max effort score is 68.8%, just 1.1 percentage points behind Claude Fable 5's top score of 69.9%, but with a per-task cost about 80% lower. GPT-6 Luna scores 66.6%, close to Opus 5 and Fable 5 at medium effort, with per-task costs about 93% and 96% lower respectively.
Machine translatedShow original
软件工程测试更能说明问题。在 DeepSWE v1.1 中,GPT-6 Sol 的 max effort 得分为 68.8%,距离 Claude Fable 5 的最高成绩 69.9% 只差 1.1 个百分点,但单任务成本低约 80%。GPT-6 Luna 得分为 66.6%,接近 Opus 5 和 Fable 5 的 medium effort,单任务成本则低约 93% 和 96%。
Show original
叫它用computeruse帮我解决问题,提醒半天死活不敢
Show original
6luna是个又蠢又慢的模型
Show original
速度貌似是比5.6时候快了一些
Show original
能力上明确强于DeepSeekv4f和pro
No selected comments for this filter in the last 7 days.