Current ranking

Coding

For the 7-day window ending 2026-09-13 21:17:03 UTC, user-experience leaders in Coding: closed models — Claude Fable 5.1 (74.9/100, n=28); open models — Qwen3.8 27B (74.8/100, n=36).

Top 3 specific models in each category. A model appears when its category sample size is at least 5. Rank movement compares the previous published snapshot.

Closed models Open models

#1 Claude Fable 5.1n=28 74.9▾

“I still prefer fable for architecture design, multi file codebase changes, etc. at least for me, in the domain of web apps, fable feels more reliable and writes cleaner code.”
via Reddit · 2026-09-13

“Fable 5.1 beats astra in code quality, but astra does almost everything else better.”
via Reddit · 2026-09-13

Open model detail →

#2 Claude Fable 5n=62 67.9▾

“Solving obscure problems by writing code, usually Fable but with a smaller margin”
via Reddit · 2026-09-13

“Fable was for more significant load bearing ones like new architecture.”
via Reddit · 2026-09-13

Open model detail →

#3 Claude Sonnet 5n=5 66.5→

#1 Qwen3.8 27Bn=36 74.8▾

“Glimmer is not better than qwen3.8:27b for coding by a very very big margin”
via Reddit · 2026-09-12

“My local model spits out code and tests 24/7”
via Reddit · 2026-09-12

Open model detail →

#2 GLM 5.3 Flashn=27 65.3▾

“在代码这块，glm5.3flash我没感到有什么特殊之处”
via Zhihu · Chinese · 2026-09-13

“GLM 5.3 Flash (Excellent+ all-rounder)”
via Reddit · 2026-09-12

Open model detail →

#3 GLM 5.3n=18 63.8▾

“If Luna MAX works for you, 5.3 probably will too since it's the stronger model.”
via Reddit · 2026-09-13

“GLM-5.3 is a very capable software engineering model.”
via Reddit · 2026-09-12

Open model detail →