Claude · Last 7 days
Claude Fable 5.1
0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.
Updated 2026-10-03 22:52 UTC · 2026-09-26 – 2026-10-03 UTCDiscussion overview
What the full sample discusses
All platforms · 37 eligible comments over 7 days, including usage-limit feedback; deduplicated by source and comment.
- Reasoning · 14 comments: 12 positive / 1 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
- General text · 14 comments: 7 positive / 5 negative / 2 mixed or neutral
- Coding · 3 comments: 2 positive / 1 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
- Usage limits · 3 comments: 0 positive / 2 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
Comments may cover multiple dimensions; counts are not additive or equivalent to the weighted score. Links show selected source excerpts.
Recent change
Rolling 7-day score: +3.6 points vs 7 days ago. Discussion mix can affect scores; this does not establish a cause.
Source coverage and discussion concentration
Hacker News 5 · Reddit 29 · Zhihu 3
29 identifiable discussions cover 32/37 comments; the largest has 2. Remaining thread identities are unknown; this is not a count of independent users.
Selected individual opinions
One user actively uses Fable 5.1 specifically for planning tasks. One user says Claude Fable 5.1 has no use case now, since Opus 5.5 is better even on complex tasks.
About the sample and scores
As of 2026-10-03 22:52:03 UTC, Claude Fable 5.1 in the Claude family has 37 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 67.9/100. Available category scores include General text 54.9/100 (n=14); Reasoning 74.6/100 (n=14). Scoring method and sources
RECENT EXPERIENCE
How the Experience Index is changing
30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.
Tap or use ← → for dates, scores and sample sizes. Blank dates have insufficient data.
Daily readings & sample sizes
| Date | Score | n | Scoring window (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-03 | 45.1 | 5 | 2026-09-26T22:52:03+00:00 – 2026-10-03T22:52:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 41.8 | 6 | 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 41.8 | 6 | 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 45.5 | 5 | 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 49.1 | 6 | 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 46.8 | 17 | 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-27 | 48.2 | 16 | 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-27T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-26 | 48.2 | 16 | 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-26T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 50.6 | 15 | 2026-09-18T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 50.6 | 15 | 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-24T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 50.6 | 15 | 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 49.5 | 16 | 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | — | 4 | 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-20 | 52.1 | 6 | 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-19 | 52.1 | 6 | 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 52.1 | 6 | 2026-09-11T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-09-18T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 52.1 | 6 | 2026-09-10T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 55.7 | 8 | 2026-09-09T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 59.0 | 5 | 2026-09-08T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 55.2 | 6 | 2026-09-07T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-13 | — | 3 | 2026-09-06T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-12 | — | 3 | 2026-09-05T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | — | 4 | 2026-09-04T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-11T23:00:04+00:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 56.0 | 9 | 2026-09-03T23:00:05+00:00 – 2026-09-10T23:00:05+00:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 39.6 | 15 | 2026-09-02T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-09T23:00:04+00:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 32.3 | 45 | 2026-09-01T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-08T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-07 | 32.9 | 44 | 2026-08-31T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-07T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-06 | 32.9 | 44 | 2026-08-30T23:00:02+00:00 – 2026-09-06T23:00:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-05 | 32.9 | 44 | 2026-08-29T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-05T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 31.5 | 43 | 2026-08-28T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-04T23:00:03+00:00 |
Hacker News · 45.1 · 5 scored comments · Read platform reviews →
ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
Across the communities
Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.
Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.
Explore long-term changes & analysis
This version is not yet tracked since release; recent 7-day experience is shown above.
Community reviews
Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.
2 selected excerpts
Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.
Show original
如果你对质量要求比较高,要么上强力的 Skill 做辅助,要么直接用更强的模型,比如 GPT-6 Astra、Claude Opus 5.5 或者 Claude Fable 5.1 这种级别的。
Comment context
Honestly though, AI's overall capability for making PPTs hasn't reached a very satisfying level yet. So if you have high quality requirements, either use powerful Skills to assist, or directly use stronger models like GPT-6 Astra, Claude Opus 5.5, or Claude Fable 5.1 of that caliber.
Machine translatedShow original
不过说实话,目前 AI 做 PPT 的整体能力还没到让人很满意的程度。所以如果你对质量要求比较高,要么上强力的 Skill 做辅助,要么直接用更强的模型,比如 GPT-6 Astra、Claude Opus 5.5 或者 Claude Fable 5.1 这种级别的。
Comment context
Astra requires multiple turns and fresh refactoring agents to produce good code.
Comment context
If Astra is that great, how come its code introduces so many bugs? Give Astra a complicated task on Ultra, and then after give the prompt "review" - you will get about 5 problems. Ask to fix those, then after review again and you'll get another 5. Should I just not bother sending the review prompt and hope for the best, and only ask to fix issues I notice myself?!
No selected comments for this filter in the last 7 days.