Claude Opus 4.6

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-09-05 14:21 UTC · 2026-08-29 – 2026-09-05 UTC

Community score70.4/10017 comments in 7 days

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

10 selected excerpts

PositiveReasoning2026-09-04

“Opus 4.6 is much more capable with that”

PositiveCoding2026-09-03

“Opus 4.6 put out better code and could plan - hence why it is better”

PositiveSpeed & latency2026-09-03

“working great for me”

PositiveSpeed & latency2026-09-02

“got a few hours of Opus 4.6 at a time”

PositiveGeneral text2026-09-01

“The only saving grace is Opus 4.6 is still available.”

MixedReasoning2026-08-31

“nicer to talk to but it's not going to be as effective”

PositiveReasoning2026-08-31

“I love reading the "thinking" of Opus 4.6”

NegativeReasoning2026-08-30

“ever hallucinating infantile Opus 4.6”

PositiveSpeed & latency2026-08-30

“I just want Claude Opus 4.6 back when it was incredible at 20,000 tok/s and no limits”

NegativeGeneral text2026-08-30

“Opus 4.6 might be able to go head-to-head with a fully-powered Qwen 3.8 27B”

RedNotezhMachine translated

Show original

opus 4.6 可能满血的qwen 3.8 27b都能打个有来有回