← All models

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Opus 5.5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 11:22 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score81.0/100976 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user considers Opus 5.5 fantastic for creativity and creating new things. One user reports Opus 5.5 refused requests, but in one case explaining it was a game made it comply.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 11:27:03 UTC, Claude Opus 5.5 in the Claude family has 976 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 81.0/100. Available category scores include General text 78.6/100 (n=365); Coding 83.7/100 (n=106); Reasoning 88.9/100 (n=285). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

3 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

NegativeSafety & refusals

“I’ve had opus5.5 push back… in one case I explained it’s a game, and yeah, we made a game that does exactly what I wanted to do.”

NegativeSafety & refusals

“I can’t even put reasoning traces in front of opus 5.5 without hitting a “reasoning extraction” claude code notice guardrail?”

NegativeSafety & refusals

“i am still getting the same push back”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

I just tried switching to the "accept edits on" mode, i am still getting the same push back.

Post by the same author ↗

I would manually log into my online banking, I would let Claude select the payees and then insert the amount to pay via playwright or chrome connect. I would be the one authorising the payment, but with the Opus 5.5 And a few other versions that I've tried, including Sonnet it seems to refuse to do any of the work!

How's your AI experience today?