← All models

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Opus 5.5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 10:37 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score81.1/100972 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user feels Claude often responds in a hard-to-condense dense way, but Opus 5.5 is a little better at giving more normal, human-like responses. One user reports Opus 5.5 refused requests, but in one case explaining it was a game made it comply.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 10:42:02 UTC, Claude Opus 5.5 in the Claude family has 972 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 81.1/100. Available category scores include General text 78.7/100 (n=362); Coding 83.7/100 (n=106); Reasoning 89.0/100 (n=287). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

14 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

NegativeSafety & refusals

“I’ve had opus5.5 push back… in one case I explained it’s a game, and yeah, we made a game that does exactly what I wanted to do.”

NegativeGeneral text

“Astra and Opus 5.5 are great, but even what they make might not even be worthy the lowest tier indie games.”

NegativeSafety & refusals

“I can’t even put reasoning traces in front of opus 5.5 without hitting a “reasoning extraction” claude code notice guardrail?”

NegativeGeneral text

“Opus 5.0 and 5.5 (still) feel more like steering dependant”

NegativeSafety & refusals

“i am still getting the same push back”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

I just tried switching to the "accept edits on" mode, i am still getting the same push back.

Post by the same author ↗

I would manually log into my online banking, I would let Claude select the payees and then insert the amount to pay via playwright or chrome connect. I would be the one authorising the payment, but with the Opus 5.5 And a few other versions that I've tried, including Sonnet it seems to refuse to do any of the work!

NegativeReasoning

“made a very simple mistake, and another simple mistake, again”

NegativeSpeed & latency

“it is also little slow even compared to Astra”

NegativeSpeed & latency

“holy fuck he is getting me crazy on how slow he is at doing tasks”

NegativeReasoning

“outright ignores what the user has stated as facts and doesn't ask when those dont align”

NegativeUsage limits

“I can run Claude Opus 5.5 on x high for 12 hours and burn 12% of my week”

NegativeUsage limits

“Opus 5.5 + Fable 5.1 on a $200 plan/heavy workload/single task eats about 15%/day”

NegativeRoleplay / creative

“graphics would be 10x better”

Comment context
Original post ↗

It started from one prompt I typed into Claude Code: "*using only pixels directly remake a beautiful pokemon red remake … absolute pixel art perfection.

Original post ↗

* No image files at all. The game draws into a 320×180 screen pixel by pixel.

NegativeImage understanding

“Neither Astra nor Opus 5.5 could recognize that a UI design with cropped borders—caused by insufficient padding—was problematic.”

How's your AI experience today?