Claude · Last 7 days
Claude Opus 5.5
0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.
Updated 2026-10-02 14:32 UTC · 2026-09-25 – 2026-10-02 UTCRECENT EXPERIENCE
How the Experience Index is changing
30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.
Daily readings & sample sizes
| Date | Score | n | Scoring window (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 64.5 | 85 | 2026-09-25T14:32:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T14:32:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 64.5 | 85 | 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 64.2 | 87 | 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 61.5 | 125 | 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 55.9 | 101 | 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-27 | 63.0 | 61 | 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-27T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-26 | 62.6 | 58 | 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-26T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 60.5 | 52 | 2026-09-18T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 59.7 | 51 | 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-24T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 58.5 | 47 | 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 |
Hacker News · 64.5 · 85 scored comments · Read platform reviews →
ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
Across the communities
Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.
Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.
What people think
One user feels Claude Opus 5.5 burns significantly fewer tokens than Opus 5 One user sarcastically remarked that Sonnet 3.5 is faster than Opus 5.5
About the sample and scores
As of 2026-10-02 14:32:03 UTC, Claude Opus 5.5 in the Claude family has 857 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 79.3/100. Available category scores include General text 75.3/100 (n=329); Coding 81.3/100 (n=85); Reasoning 89.8/100 (n=242). Scoring method and sources
Community reviews
Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.
1 selected excerpts
Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.
Comment context
Opus 5.5 (O5.5) has been exceptional for me in Claude Code over the last six days. Architecture-first, DRY/SOLID coding out of the box, exceptional communication style, phenomenal token efficiency. I’ve been working with it basically nonstop, ~12 hours a day, since last Wednesday. But right around the time my monthly limit reset this evening, I noticed an extreme shift in communication style and coding behavior that feels suspiciously like Opus 5 (O5). For the last week, O5.5 would take my requirements and immediately get to work, usually knocking out a feature in minutes and doing an incredible job across implementation, UX, architecture, and token efficiency. Tonight, I’m seeing something very different.
Where O5.5 consistently respected DRY principles and the existing architecture, the modules created tonight are suddenly happy to reinvent every wheel that came before them. The difference in ability is not subtle. The other tell is token usage. O5.5 has been startlingly efficient compared with O5, which was an absolute token-eating monster. I’ve been getting substantially more feature work done with O5.5 at a fraction of the token usage. Tonight, simple tasks and relatively small features are suddenly devouring tokens at a pace that feels much more like O5. I’m especially sensitive to this because I have to request an increase in my spend limit every time I hit it. On O5, I was sending a request almost every day. On O5.5, I hadn’t needed to send a single one all week. Then tonight I jumped from roughly 70% to 90% usage in about an hour.
Comment context
SOL 5.6 and 6.1 both are monsters for high level backend coding.
Show original
这个确实牛逼在， Claude 整出来的这个算法研究本身，看起来确实有些新东西
Comment context
It started from one prompt I typed into Claude Code: "*using only pixels directly remake a beautiful pokemon red remake … absolute pixel art perfection.
* No image files at all. The game draws into a 320×180 screen pixel by pixel.
Comment context
I gave Opus 5.5 my Minecraft mod file and told it to create a Trailer
No selected comments for this filter in the last 7 days.