← All models

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Sonnet 5.5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 09:57 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score65.4/100113 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user recommends using Claude Sonnet 5.5 high as the implementer in a coding workflow supervised by Opus 5.5. One user states they wouldn't trust Sonnet to provide any architecture or design advice.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 10:42:02 UTC, Claude Sonnet 5.5 in the Claude family has 113 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 65.4/100. Available category scores include General text 67.2/100 (n=55); Coding 75.0/100 (n=8); Reasoning 63.6/100 (n=23). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

2 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

NeutralReasoning

“What the OP stated happens with Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 too.”

Comment context
Original post ↗

If Astra is that great, how come its code introduces so many bugs? Give Astra a complicated task on Ultra, and then after give the prompt "review" - you will get about 5 problems.

How's your AI experience today?