Claude · Last 7 days
Claude Sonnet 5
0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.
Updated 2026-10-04 08:32 UTC · 2026-09-27 – 2026-10-04 UTCDiscussion overview
What the full sample discusses
All platforms · 26 eligible comments over 7 days, including usage-limit feedback; deduplicated by source and comment.
- General text · 17 comments: 5 positive / 11 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
- Speed & latency · 5 comments: 1 positive / 4 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
- Reasoning · 3 comments: 1 positive / 2 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
- Coding · 2 comments: 1 positive / 1 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
Comments may cover multiple dimensions; counts are not additive or equivalent to the weighted score. Links show selected source excerpts.
Recent change
Rolling 7-day score: −12.4 points vs 7 days ago. Discussion mix can affect scores; this does not establish a cause.
Source coverage and discussion concentration
Hacker News 8 · Reddit 16 · Zhihu 2
16 identifiable discussions cover 18/26 comments; the largest has 2. Remaining thread identities are unknown; this is not a count of independent users.
Selected individual opinions
One user prefers Sonnet 5 and Gemini Flash 3.8 as alternatives, finding 6.1 Sol slow and poorly communicative. One user found their month-long experience with codex/GPT 5.6 noticeably better than Claude Sonnet 5 overall.
About the sample and scores
As of 2026-10-04 08:32:03 UTC, Claude Sonnet 5 in the Claude family has 26 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 34.3/100. Available category scores include General text 37.5/100 (n=17); Speed & latency 39.1/100 (n=5). Scoring method and sources
RECENT EXPERIENCE
How the Experience Index is changing
30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.
Tap or use ← → for dates, scores and sample sizes. Blank dates have insufficient data.
No trend available
RedNote · Not enough opinions · 0 scored comments · Read platform reviews →
ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
Across the communities
Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.
Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.
Explore long-term changes & analysis
This version is not yet tracked since release; recent 7-day experience is shown above.
Community reviews
Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.
0 selected excerpts
Comment context
6.1 Sol is slow, lazy, does not communicate well and code quality is not on par with other models
Comment context
But after a few tasks I realised it was omitting huge details of complex tasks that Fable just would not have missed. It instead creates a version that passes its own tests and asserts that the job is done (which to be fair, all LLMs do). But in comparison to 5.1, its like it takes intentional shortcuts to get the job 'done'. It looks like it's been tuned to trim "non-essential" aspects of a task to get to the end faster. And I don't think this is isolated to large tasks that have room for interpretation. I've caught doing the same with much smaller side tasks that both Sonnet or Fable would have nailed every time.
Show original
啊？我还觉得sonnet5挺好用的，居然扑街了？
Comment context
I built an adversarial esoteric programming language to benchmark LLM models and just ran it on Sonnet 5.5 It does worse than Sonnet 5.
Comment context
At work we have copilot and even with 750$ credits I use opus very sparingly and I even replaced it with sonnet 5 recently because I wasn't very impressed with the results, can't wait we enable opus 5.5 next week.
No selected comments for this filter in the last 7 days.