Community-tracked AI experience, updated hourly
EN
Menu
← All modelsLeaderboard →

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Sonnet 5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-02 14:32 UTC · 2026-09-25 – 2026-10-02 UTC
Experience score32.5/10030 comments in 7 days

RECENT EXPERIENCE

How the Experience Index is changing

Not enough historyvs 7 days ago · points

30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.

Claude Sonnet 5 · Hacker News · 30 days of rolling 7-day experience scores 30405060 Observed-day mean: 40.3 2026-09-04 · 38.4 · n=5 · 2026-08-28T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-04T23:00:03+00:002026-09-05 · 42.6 · n=6 · 2026-08-29T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-05T23:00:03+00:002026-09-06 · 46.9 · n=7 · 2026-08-30T23:00:02+00:00 – 2026-09-06T23:00:02+00:002026-09-07 · 50.7 · n=8 · 2026-08-31T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-07T23:00:03+00:002026-09-08 · 50.7 · n=8 · 2026-09-01T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-08T23:00:03+00:002026-09-09 · 58.5 · n=6 · 2026-09-02T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-09T23:00:04+00:002026-09-28 · 31.8 · n=9 · 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:002026-09-29 · 31.7 · n=9 · 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:002026-09-30 · 30.7 · n=8 · 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:002026-10-01 · 30.7 · n=8 · 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:002026-10-02 · 30.7 · n=8 · 2026-09-25T14:32:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T14:32:03+00:00 30.7 09-0309-1109-1809-2510-02 Claude Sonnet 5 · Hacker News · 30 days of rolling 7-day experience scores 30405060 Observed-day mean: 40.3 2026-09-04 · 38.4 · n=5 · 2026-08-28T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-04T23:00:03+00:002026-09-05 · 42.6 · n=6 · 2026-08-29T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-05T23:00:03+00:002026-09-06 · 46.9 · n=7 · 2026-08-30T23:00:02+00:00 – 2026-09-06T23:00:02+00:002026-09-07 · 50.7 · n=8 · 2026-08-31T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-07T23:00:03+00:002026-09-08 · 50.7 · n=8 · 2026-09-01T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-08T23:00:03+00:002026-09-09 · 58.5 · n=6 · 2026-09-02T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-09T23:00:04+00:002026-09-28 · 31.8 · n=9 · 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:002026-09-29 · 31.7 · n=9 · 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:002026-09-30 · 30.7 · n=8 · 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:002026-10-01 · 30.7 · n=8 · 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:002026-10-02 · 30.7 · n=8 · 2026-09-25T14:32:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T14:32:03+00:00 30.7 09-0309-1109-1809-2510-02
Daily readings & sample sizes
DateScorenScoring window (UTC)
2026-10-0230.782026-09-25T14:32:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T14:32:03+00:00
2026-10-0130.782026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00
2026-09-3030.782026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-2931.792026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-2831.892026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-27—32026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-27T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-26—22026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-26T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-25—22026-09-18T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-24—22026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-24T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-23—12026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-22—22026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-21—22026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-20—22026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-19—22026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-18—22026-09-11T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-09-18T23:57:02+00:00
2026-09-17—32026-09-10T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-16—32026-09-09T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-15—22026-09-08T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-14—12026-09-07T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-13—12026-09-06T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-12—32026-09-05T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00
2026-09-11—32026-09-04T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-11T23:00:04+00:00
2026-09-10—42026-09-03T23:00:05+00:00 – 2026-09-10T23:00:05+00:00
2026-09-0958.562026-09-02T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-09T23:00:04+00:00
2026-09-0850.782026-09-01T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-08T23:00:03+00:00
2026-09-0750.782026-08-31T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-07T23:00:03+00:00
2026-09-0646.972026-08-30T23:00:02+00:00 – 2026-09-06T23:00:02+00:00
2026-09-0542.662026-08-29T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-05T23:00:03+00:00
2026-09-0438.452026-08-28T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-04T23:00:03+00:00
2026-09-03—42026-08-27T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-03T23:00:03+00:00

Hacker News · 30.7 · 8 scored comments · Read platform reviews →

ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES

Across the communities

Last 7 days

Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.

RedditLatest scored opinion 2026-10-01 01:04 UTC38.419 opinionsvs 7d ago −7.7Hacker NewsLatest scored opinion 2026-09-28 23:29 UTC30.78 opinionsvs 7d ago Not enough historyZhihuLatest scored opinion 2026-09-30 00:35 UTC—2 opinionsInsufficient sampleRedNoteNo scored opinion timestamp—0 opinionsInsufficient sample

Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.

What people think

One user finds that Opus 5.5 takes shortcuts on small side tasks, while Sonnet and Fable would have completed them properly. One user found their month-long experience with codex/GPT 5.6 noticeably better than Claude Sonnet 5 overall.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-02 14:32:03 UTC, Claude Sonnet 5 in the Claude family has 30 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 32.5/100. Available category scores include General text 38.4/100 (n=19); Speed & latency 34.9/100 (n=5). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

Platform
Sentiment

4 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

NegativeGeneral text

“Sonnet 5 was so horrible”

Hacker News ↗
NegativeSpeed & latency

“Sonnet 5 to perform worse across all of our evals, especially against time”

Hacker News ↗
NeutralGeneral text

“I would never get an answer back even for very simple prompts. It would just churn on nothing and return max token usage reached”

Hacker News ↗
PositiveReasoning

“It does worse than Sonnet 5. Mainly because it is more reluctant to keep going to get an answer”

Hacker News ↗
Comment context
From the same comment ↗

I built an adversarial esoteric programming language to benchmark LLM models and just ran it on Sonnet 5.5 It does worse than Sonnet 5.

How's your AI experience today?