GLM 5.3

“Only found out when I plugged it in GLM-5.3 to troubleshoot. Thanks for the script, it works great.”

“warm up context with non-RE things with American models > switch to GLM 5.3 with actual request, let it fill context with some RE work”

“Compared to other AIs, after this update and the arrival of GLM-5.3, it has a very aggressive security protocol. Anything I ask her to do or create, she gives off a completely distorted view, saying that it's dangerous and could cause risk”

“I can actually have 16 GLM 5.3 agents running concurrently at the same time.”

“Worth the money for me, I got their Max plan, orchestrate planning with glm 5.3, small and implementing things are flash, also I got extra claude max for fable only for review. Shit just run”

“GLM 5.3 is truly the GOAT for me right now, I had a large project that both GPT and Claude completely shat the bed in, and I just got the 300mil tokens claim and YOLOd zcode on the project.”

“Run glm 5.3 dsv4 flash etc you can parallel like 4 agents at least”

“just use glm 5.3 now which perfectly fits”

“one shotted this with GLM 5.3”

“GLM 5.3 on same level in dev work as SOL for me. Sometimes even better. I'm using SOL for roadmap/tasks, then GLM audit on them and real work.”

“Full GLM 5.3 (not Flash) on Max reasoning falls somewhere between GPT 5.6 Terra-High and Sol-High in my (coding) use. I let it daily-drive and use Sol to check plans. Helps usage stretch far for me.”

“GLM completes engineering, kimi does verification and returns iteration plans”

“I do find it unnecessary for the model to referencing time so much in its outputs but it does flow in my experience so it hasnt really been a negative quirk”

“Its IQ sits at the same table as top-tier models, but what it can't do, GLM-5.3 usually can't either.”

“For example, GLM-5.3's real generalization ability still has a gap compared to overseas top-tier models, but its AA benchmark total score closely trails GPT-6 (only one point behind).”

“it had no problem completely busting a comprehensive GLM 5.3 diagnosis for me 5 minutes ago to which GLM had to admit defeat lol”

“With GLM 5.3, your setup would do worse than what you see in benchmarks, since you'd have to run a lower quant than what the benchmarks use.”

“You can only fit GLM 5.3 in Q4, so I doubt it makes sense to trade that for full precision on DeepSeek.”

“Knowledge-rich: I had it transcribe a piece of music for Jasmine Flower, and the result was about 80-90% accurate. Give the same task to GLM-5.3, and it only repeats the first line before forgetting the rest.”

“5.1 in group chats always ends up talking like a robot after playing for a while.”

“geometry and polygons were weak”

“Both have objectively terrible staircases.”

“5.3 Flash is awesome, actually feels like the next generation compared to the bigger 5.3.”

“stick to models that can fit (+ their context windows) on RAM, Q4 GLM 5.3 or Q8 GLM 5.3 Flash might be better fits”

“Switched back to GLM 5.3 exclusively but route any vision needs to Flash.”

“Flash needs 192gb vram for nice inference and 5.3 fits same 192gb at nvfp4 (but tight)”