GPT · Last 7 days
GPT-6 Sol
0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.
Updated 2026-10-03 05:02 UTC · 2026-09-26 – 2026-10-03 UTCDiscussion overview
What the full sample discusses
All platforms · 180 eligible comments over 7 days, including usage-limit feedback; deduplicated by source and comment.
- General text · 108 comments: 23 positive / 79 negative / 6 mixed or neutral
- Usage limits · 21 comments: 2 positive / 14 negative / 5 mixed or neutral
- Reasoning · 20 comments: 7 positive / 13 negative / 0 mixed or neutral
- Speed & latency · 20 comments: 11 positive / 8 negative / 1 mixed or neutral
Comments may cover multiple dimensions; counts are not additive or equivalent to the weighted score. Links show selected source excerpts.
Recent change
Rolling 7-day score: −4.5 points vs 7 days ago. Discussion mix can affect scores; this does not establish a cause.
Source coverage and discussion concentration
Hacker News 16 · Reddit 112 · v2ex 1 · RedNote 3 · Zhihu 48
71 identifiable discussions cover 164/180 comments; the largest has 19. Remaining thread identities are unknown; this is not a count of independent users.
Selected individual opinions
One user feels GPT-6.1 Sol is not as good as GPT-6 Sol, indirectly affirming GPT-6 Sol is the better option. One user reports GPT-6 Sol usage on xhigh for complex coding tasks dropped from 40 mins to 20-25 mins.
About the sample and scores
As of 2026-10-03 05:02:03 UTC, GPT-6 Sol in the GPT family has 180 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 29.2/100. Available category scores include General text 24.7/100 (n=108); Coding 36.2/100 (n=13); Reasoning 41.6/100 (n=20). Scoring method and sources
RECENT EXPERIENCE
How the Experience Index is changing
30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.
Tap or use ← → for dates, scores and sample sizes. Blank dates have insufficient data.
No trend available
RedNote · Not enough opinions · 3 scored comments · Read platform reviews →
ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
Across the communities
Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.
Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.
Explore long-term changes & analysis
This version is not yet tracked since release; recent 7-day experience is shown above.
Community reviews
Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.
0 selected excerpts
Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.
Show original
Tibo 给了个说法：刚发了 GPT-6 Sol 和 Luna，API 价格降了 50%，额度减半，单价也减半，一抵消，你能跑的 token 数没变
Show original
感觉还不如6sol
Comment context
GPT-6.1 sol 新变化
Machine translatedShow original
GPT-6.1 sol 新变化
Show original
太能编了，之前6sol也是这么说，实际流口水
Show original
GPT-6 Sol 是 9 月 22 日发布的，GPT-6.1 Sol 是 9 月 29 日发布的，中间就隔了一个星期
Show original
我用6SOL开发了2天的东西，由于过于烂，所以我让Astra重写了
Comment context
In my testing yesterday GPT 6 Sol still beat Opus 5.5 on code review (of GPT written code in this case) 6.1 will probably perform even better.
Comment context
5.6 sol always goes off on tangents or thinks itself into a corner.
Show original
放进 Codex 里修同一个 bug，DeepSeek 21 秒，Sol 58 秒，两个都修对了
Show original
GPT-6 Sol 的 max effort 得分为 68.8%，距离 Claude Fable 5 的最高成绩 69.9% 只差 1.1 个百分点，但单任务成本低约 80%
Show original
在官方图表里，GPT-6 Sol 跑 DeepSWE 每任务 2.74 美元，上代是 6.46 美元
Show original
用下来感觉调校比较保守，事事都得问一下确认，应该是严格受控版本
No selected comments for this filter in the last 7 days.