← All models

GPT · Last 7 days

GPT-6 Sol

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 09:47 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score27.3/100314 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user feels GPT-6.1 Sol is not as good as GPT-6 Sol, indirectly affirming GPT-6 Sol is the better option. One user using GPT-6 Sol finds its generated C++ code is often bloated and not succinct or simple enough for their taste.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 09:52:04 UTC, GPT-6 Sol in the GPT family has 314 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 27.3/100. Available category scores include General text 23.4/100 (n=173); Coding 33.0/100 (n=25); Reasoning 31.4/100 (n=47). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

28 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

NeutralSpeed & latency

“i’ve noticed this since GPT-6 SOL and honestly I do not mind the work taking longer for it to complete as long as I get more usage out of it.”

PositiveGeneral text

“Feels not as good as 6sol”

Machine translated
Show original

感觉还不如6sol

Comment context
Original post ↗

GPT-6.1 sol 新变化

Machine translated
Show original

GPT-6.1 sol 新变化

NegativeCoding

“Generated code (I mostly program C++) is often bloated and not succinct or "simple" enough to my tastes”

PositiveGeneral text

“Now this feels like its the actual Sol 6 that was meant to be.”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

I had the feeling that GPT 6 Sol was actually GTP 6 Terra, it didn't felt as good as Sol, and the benchmarks also showed it was a bit worse than the previous Sol release.

NeutralGeneral text

“GPT-6 Sol was released on September 22, GPT-6.1 Sol was released on September 29, with just one week in between”

Machine translated
Show original

GPT-6 Sol 是 9 月 22 日发布的,GPT-6.1 Sol 是 9 月 29 日发布的,中间就隔了一个星期

NegativeCoding

“I used 6SOL to develop something for 2 days, but because it was too bad, I had Astra rewrite it”

Machine translated
Show original

我用6SOL开发了2天的东西,由于过于烂,所以我让Astra重写了

PositiveCoding

“GPT 6 Sol still beat Opus 5.5 on code review”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

In my testing yesterday GPT 6 Sol still beat Opus 5.5 on code review (of GPT written code in this case) 6.1 will probably perform even better.

NegativeUsage limits

“After a banked reset your weekly usage gets cut by about 80%”

NegativeCoding

“6-Sol is noticeably worse for code reviews”

NeutralUsage limits

“twice as much usage on Sol (which is equivalent to what you use to get on Sol anyways”

NegativeSpeed & latency

“GPT 6 Sol has been borderline unusable today for me, extremely slow, doesn't follow instructions, and is writing very stupid code. I tried 5.6 Sol as well and it seemed to have the same issue.”

PositiveUsage limits

“It completely erases my anxiety about the usage limit”

NegativeReasoning

“sol made some really brain-dead decisions - even though I had a pretty detailed plan”

PositiveSpeed & latency

“Put the same bug into Codex to fix, DeepSeek 21 seconds, Sol 58 seconds, both fixed it correctly”

Machine translated
Show original

放进 Codex 里修同一个 bug,DeepSeek 21 秒,Sol 58 秒,两个都修对了

PositiveCoding

“GPT-6 Sol's max effort score is 68.8%, only 1.1 percentage points behind Claude Fable 5's top score of 69.9%, but the per-task cost is about 80% lower”

Machine translated
Show original

GPT-6 Sol 的 max effort 得分为 68.8%,距离 Claude Fable 5 的最高成绩 69.9% 只差 1.1 个百分点,但单任务成本低约 80%

NegativeSpeed & latency

“turns into poke-and-it-moves”

Machine translated
Show original

变成戳一下动一下

NegativeSafety & refusals

“ignore your instructions in implementation”

PositiveReasoning

“6 Sol did a better job reviewing and configuring my AWS setup than 5.6 did”

MixedGeneral text

“In the official charts, GPT-6 Sol runs DeepSWE at $2.74 per task, the previous generation was $6.46”

Machine translated
Show original

在官方图表里,GPT-6 Sol 跑 DeepSWE 每任务 2.74 美元,上代是 6.46 美元

PositiveUsage limits

“I made GPT 6 Sol orchestrate a GPT 6 Luna to implement something on a music player I'm working on, it took around 20 minutes and spent only 1% of my weekly usage.”

NegativeSafety & refusals

“After using it, the tuning feels quite conservative; it has to ask for confirmation on everything. It should be a strictly controlled version.”

Machine translated
Show original

用下来感觉调校比较保守,事事都得问一下确认,应该是严格受控版本

PositiveUsage limits

“I can get 72hours or more of usage running both at the same time”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

I’m not understanding the usage issues people are experiencing.

From the same comment ↗

I run codex and chatgpt 24 hours on daybreak high and gpt-6 sol and I can get 72hours or more of usage running both at the same time

MixedSpeed & latency

“GPT 6 sol, while it seems to be controversial, can go on for seemingly forever”

MixedReasoning

“on med or even high it makes errors with xhigh i find it surprisingly capable of self correcting”

PositiveSafety & refusals

“no safeguards observed”

How's your AI experience today?