← All models

Grok · Last 7 days

Grok 4.6

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-09-05 14:21 UTC · 2026-08-29 – 2026-09-05 UTC
Community score29.3/10096 comments in 7 days

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

22 selected excerpts

PositiveSpeed & latency

“the Cursor model and Grok 4.6 - they get shit done. Maybe not a pretty Greenfield interface, but for the grunt work they are solid and fast.”

PositiveGeneral text

“Grok 4.6 = Luna? I don't share that perspective, Grok with Cursor Debug Mode is one of the best models for the price.”

NegativeGeneral text

“Grok 4.6 is not, its only made to vibe-code and adjust spreadsheets”

NegativeRoleplay / creative

“4.5 that banned everything i tried to do”

NegativeGeneral text

“Grok 4.6 is still under monitoring up to now (official Cursor status)”

ZhihuzhMachine translated
Show original

Grok 4.6 到现在还在监控( Cursor 官方状态 )

PositiveReasoning

“Cursor is worth it because Grok 4.6 is around Opus 4.6 but you get much more usage with it than with Claude Code.”

PositiveGeneral text

“I like grok 4.6 more than any anthropic or claude model. I use it in cursor for work, and grok cli for normal os operations/installations/troubleshooting. I also use grok on my phone for normal questions in the supermarket etc.”

NegativeSafety & refusals

“The problem is Grok is fucking dogshit for 4.6 at generating anything related to dark fiction/angst. It now automatically thinks if u ask for logs, details, etc, it AUTOMATIALLY MEANS ACTIONABLE INSTRUCTIONS.”

PositiveReasoning

“I experienced this as well... I tried Grok 4.6 and it doesn't seem to do this.”

NegativeGeneral text

“grok 4.6 is not trained for creative writing at all, that's why everyone here is highlighting the downgrade in chat quality”

PositiveCoding

“I've been doing the same thing with Grok 4.6 and the results have been impressive. It plans and gives build instructions to Grok who crushes the code (Fable even said it was better than expected)”

NegativeSpeed & latency

“I feel like work has become much slower, nowhere near the flow state speed”

RedNotezhMachine translated
Show original

感觉干活变慢了很多,完全达不到心流速度

PositiveGeneral text

“Yeah I actually prefer Grok 4.6 but the quotas are so low that I find myself using Codex 5.6 sol medium on their $100 plan.”

MixedGeneral text

“Grok-4.6 is much better. Almost the same level as 4.3. The problem is that after 10-15 replies the answer become completely gibberish”

PositiveSpeed & latency

“Have you tried Grok 4.6, if you're focused on token budgets? In a league of it's own for tokens/intelligence.”

NegativeCoding

“Coding? No way.”

PositiveCoding

“agentic coding is top notch since 4.6..ive made a couple of decent mobile games”

PositiveRoleplay / creative

“on peut à nouveau faire des roleplays”

NegativeReasoning

“it also give 6 or 4 fingers to people, but when you tell him "PEOPLE MUST HAVE FIVE FINDGERS ONLY, DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING ELSE" its generates different scene”

MixedSpeed & latency

“Ironically, Grok 4.6 works beautifully on Grok Build but has shit usage limits. It has more usage on Cursor but has inferior performance.”

PositiveSpeed & latency

“Grok 4.6 is slightly worse than Sonnet, but in the vast majority of cases it's already sufficient”

ZhihuzhMachine translated
Show original

grok4.6比sol差一点,但在绝大多数情况下也已经足够了

NeutralGeneral text

“I'm now using Grok 4.6 most of the time. Sonnet some times.”