Ling
26 opinions tracked this week · 7-day rolling window
30-day experience score
Version breakdown
Only comments that explicitly name a version contribute to its score.
| Ling-3.0-flash | 43.2−8.8 | n=10 | Confidence: Medium |
|---|
16 generic family mentions are included in the family score, not any version score.
By experience dimension
| General text | 47.4 | n=5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | not enough data | n=3 | |
| Reasoning | not enough data | n=3 | |
| Image / vision | not enough data | n=0 | |
| Video generation | not enough data | n=0 | |
| Roleplay / creative | not enough data | n=1 | |
| Safety & refusals | not enough data | n=0 | |
| Speed & latency | 60.0 | n=14 | |
| Local deploy | not enough data | n=0 |
Top positive drivers
- speed quality Speed & latency ×7
- strong reasoning Reasoning ×1
- surprise impressive Reasoning ×1
- aux model context compression General text ×1
- release rollout General text ×1
Top negative drivers
- speed quality Speed & latency ×2
- performance issue Coding ×1
- tool failure Coding ×1
- hallucination Reasoning ×1
- emotional companionship Roleplay / creative ×1
What users are saying
Selected from the latest 7 days, prioritizing recency, evidence quality, confidence, and engagement.
⚪ “Ling Q4 ran around 35TPS without any optimization on my halo strix, so I expect similar”
via Reddit · Speed & latency · 2026-08-25
🟢 “I'm playing with Ling 3.0 Tiny and is really enjoyable”
via Reddit · Reasoning · 2026-08-24
🟢 “Trying Ling 3.0 Tiny rn. Looks like a little beast, flying at 60 Tok/sec. Amazing! To me looks on par with Gemma 4 12b QAT but really faster.”
via Reddit · Speed & latency · 2026-08-24
⚪ “The model is not so good at coding too, comparing to qwen and gemma to be honest.”
via Reddit · Coding · 2026-08-24
🔴 “I tried Ling 3.0 Tiny at Q4_K_M. Thinking must be enabled or it will be very stupid. But enabling thinking makes it slower than e.g. gemma4-E4B or Qwen3.5-4B for simple tasks like translation or spam detection.”
via Reddit · Speed & latency · 2026-08-24