Llama

49.2 experience score ▲ 2.0 Confidence: High

31 opinions tracked this week · 7-day rolling window

30-day experience score

40506007-1507-1607-17

Version breakdown

Only comments that explicitly name a version contribute to its score.

CodeLLaMa 7B Instruct Solidity mentions only n=1 Confidence: Insufficient
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct mentions only n=1 Confidence: Insufficient

30 generic family mentions are included in the family score, not any version score.

By experience dimension

General text 46 n=8
Coding not enough data n=2
Reasoning not enough data n=2
Image / vision not enough data n=0
Roleplay / creative not enough data n=0
Safety & refusals not enough data n=0
Speed & latency 48 n=16
Local deploy not enough data n=3

Top positive drivers

  • speed quality Speed & latency ×5
  • tool failure Coding ×1
  • customization ease Local deploy ×1
  • low end hardware Local deploy ×1
  • memory flexibility Local deploy ×1

Top negative drivers

  • performance issue Speed & latency ×4
  • speed quality Speed & latency ×2
  • performance issue General text ×2
  • tool failure Coding ×1
  • model quality Local deploy ×1

What users are saying

Selected from the latest 7 days, prioritizing recency, evidence quality, confidence, and engagement.

🟢 “undertrained but easy to finetune”

via reddit · local_deploy · en · 2026-07-17

🟢 “llama3.3: 70b is quite good model tbh”

via reddit · text_general · en · 2026-07-17

🔴 “It's a custom 3 bit quant of Llama 3.1 8B and other shortcuts. The quant is not good.”

via hackernews · text_general · en · 2026-07-17

🔴 “If anything, Kimi K3 feels easier than running Llama3-70B or 405B... I love how you say "Yet we did" as if any significant percentage of us were able to run those models lmao”

via reddit · speed_latency · en · 2026-07-17

🟢 “considering that they have a live chat with 14000t/s via Llama 3.1 8B”

via hackernews · speed_latency · en · 2026-07-17

How's your AI experience today?

One tap, no sign-up. Pick a model and tell us.