近 7 天 · 通用任务助手
OpenClaw
委托任务、调研与成果交付
体感分56.6/10041 条评论
来源 Reddit
大家怎么看
近 7 天的 41 条评论中,评价褒贬并存。批评最集中在「稳定性」(7/17 条负面摘录)。好评最集中在「工作流与集成」(10/23 条正面摘录)。有用户用OpenClaw管理公司高度定制的Zoho CRM,虽需教它一些技巧,但现在效果相当好。有用户认为 OpenClaw 应当将代理中引用的模型列表、提供商列表以及对 ollama 的查询三者合并,但目前似乎并未这样做。
用户反馈
0 条评价摘录
展开原文
I use OpenClaw to help manage my company's customised to hell Zoho CRM. It requires teaching it some tricks, but it's pretty amazing now.
展开原文
It works as a stop gap between it designing an approach and allows me to double check what it intends to do within what scopes, so it doesn't do anything scary in production.
展开原文
My golden tip is to make a new tiny project and ask it to create a reusable API connector, something it can invoke in any other conversation or sandbox to quickly set up a connection and run whatever scripts it needs on it.
展开原文
After the latest OC update this little patch from Astra was gone and no pic anymore. Interestingly I see both pics in the mobile app when I go to settings - not in the main screen/chat!
查看评论上下文
我尝试更换个人资料图片和主代理的图片——经过整整 5 小时的窗口期,Astra 终于让个人图片工作了——对于代理图片,我们放弃了 :-/
机器翻译展开原文
I try to change my personal profile pic and the one from my main agent - after a full 5h window Astra he managed to get the personal one working - for the agent we gave up :-/
展开原文
I'd think that it could combine that list, the providers list and a query of ollama but seems for now that's not the case.
查看评论上下文
我确实在agent中看到了模型被引用,想知道它们是否来自那里。
机器翻译展开原文
I do see models referenced within the agents and am wondering if that's where they are coming from.
展开原文
openclaw already can do it and even more
查看评论上下文
我建了一个购物清单,我和我妻子可以用Telegram更新
机器翻译展开原文
I built a shopping list that my wife and I can update using Telegram
展开原文
Also the bot attempts to solve each ticket by describing possible steps or even creates a pull request. Besides, we have a lot of scheduled jobs, mostly around monitoring/data quality, but deeply tied to business. Logs are watched by scheduled agent too. People generate various spreadsheets - it bridges the gap between technical and non technical people.
查看评论上下文
我在Openclaw上构建了"公司内部ChatGPT"。
机器翻译展开原文
I have built ‘company’s internal ChatGPT’ on Openclaw.
展开原文
We put more and more context to it. The bot has read-only access to almost anything.
查看评论上下文
我在Openclaw上构建了"公司内部ChatGPT"。
机器翻译展开原文
I have built ‘company’s internal ChatGPT’ on Openclaw.
展开原文
I'm using Qwen 3.8 27B on a 5090 with vLLM. I can hard;y use it on openclaw. It always hits context limit unless I barely have any text in the prompt. How are you dealing with this? Maybe I'm not doing it correctly but compared to my OpenAi agents it's basically useless due to context.
展开原文
No problems, all of my cron jobs carried over.
展开原文
Just implemented the upgrade. No problems, all of my cron jobs carried over. Great job dev team! Thank you
展开原文
It’s supported but carrying over my previous whitelist - I had to allow the gpt6 models allowlist in the openclaw. json modelPolicy.allow
查看评论上下文
6.1-sol还不支持吗?
机器翻译展开原文
6.1-sol isn’t supported yet?
展开原文
Budget checks should reserve spend before dispatch, not inspect it hourly after parallel work has already consumed the allowance.
查看评论上下文
设置了一个循环,让我的OpenClaw尽可能自主运行,同时每小时检查订阅限制(对我来说这是OpenAI,但你可以调整为你想要的任何服务)。 Main将项目分配给项目经理子代理。 Main给自己设置每小时cron任务提醒来检查订阅使用情况,低于20%时暂停所有项目和提醒,并设置新的提醒以便在限制重置时恢复。
机器翻译展开原文
Made a loop my OpenClaw become as autonomous as possible while hourly checking subscription limits (for me it's OpenAI but you can adjust it to whatever you want). Main assigns projects to a Project Manager sub-agent. Main puts hourly cron job reminders to herself to check subscription use, below 20% pauses all projects and reminders, sets new reminder to resume when limit resets.
展开原文
In our setup (OpenClaw 2026.9.5), text an agent writes before or between tool calls gets delivered as a message in heartbeat and isolated cron runs, not just the final answer. And NO_REPLY only suppresses delivery when the entire reply is exactly that one token. So "restate the request, decide whether to answer, NO_REPLY" goes out in full.
展开原文
One thing to watch if you go that way: Claude Code brings its own file-based memory (under ~/.claude/projects/...) and will offer to save things there, next to OpenClaw's memory/ folder. Decide early which one is canonical, otherwise facts end up split across two places and neither is complete.
查看评论上下文
你可能根本不需要迁移。OpenClaw可以将Claude Code作为其后端运行(claude-cli运行时),这就是我运行的设置:Telegram保持不变,工作区文件(AGENTS.md、SOUL.md、USER.md、MEMORY.md)仍然被注入到系统提示中,所以你的规则继续适用。
机器翻译展开原文
You might not need to migrate at all. OpenClaw can run Claude Code as its backend (the claude-cli runtime), and that's the setup I run on: Telegram stays, and the workspace files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, USER.md, MEMORY.md) still get injected into the system prompt, so your rules keep applying.
展开原文
That's also my answer to the "Claude ignores the agent instructions" comment further down: in this setup it follows them.
查看评论上下文
OpenClaw可以将Claude Code作为其后端运行(claude-cli运行时),这就是我的配置:Telegram保持运行,工作区文件(AGENTS.md、SOUL.md、USER.md、MEMORY.md)仍然会被注入到系统提示词中,所以你的规则继续适用。
机器翻译展开原文
OpenClaw can run Claude Code as its backend (the claude-cli runtime), and that's the setup I run on: Telegram stays, and the workspace files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, USER.md, MEMORY.md) still get injected into the system prompt, so your rules keep applying.
展开原文
OpenClaw can run Claude Code as its backend (the claude-cli runtime), and that's the setup I run on: Telegram stays, and the workspace files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, USER.md, MEMORY.md) still get injected into the system prompt, so your rules keep applying.
展开原文
Treat it like a guest and give it focused tasks and then make sure to get rid of Claude as soon as you can.
查看评论上下文
我注意到当你在 openclaw 中选择 Claude 作为模型时,会话运行 Claude code,所有子代理也在 Claude code 中运行。可以看出是因为 Claude 不受代理指令影响,而是遵循其 Claude code 规则。而且它还是个多管闲事的家伙,总是想办法查看过去的会话数据。
机器翻译展开原文
I’ve noticed that when you select Claude as the model in openclaw that the session runs Claude code and all the subagents run in Claude code. You can tell because Claude doesn’t get affected by the agent instructions and instead follows its Claude code rules. And it’s a nosy bastard too finding lots of reasons to look through past session data.
展开原文
I’ve noticed that when you select Claude as the model in openclaw that the session runs Claude code and all the subagents run in Claude code. You can tell because Claude doesn’t get affected by the agent instructions and instead follows its Claude code rules.
展开原文
And it’s a nosy bastard too finding lots of reasons to look through past session data.
展开原文
That's why openclaw still wins
查看评论上下文
你真的想把所有私人或商业数据放在云端的前沿模型上吗?
机器翻译展开原文
Do you really want all your private personal or business data in the cloud on a Frontier model?
展开原文
Open Claw is just insanely good for doing my digital marketing related work. Open Claw + Claude Opus
展开原文
I got tired of the roller coaster of bugs and just started on a new clean Ubuntu VM, pointed claude at my old repo backup of my OC and said "I want this feature, that feature, and this..." and it started building me from scratch whatever I needed.
展开原文
No forgetting a day or week later suddenly due to bloat, it is just very efficient.
展开原文
The part I like is that autonomy is bounded by budget, role separation, checkpoints, and recovery rules instead of just “let the agent keep going.”
展开原文
I just set up WhatsApp on a new sim and then assigned that number to OpenClaw. Discarded the sim and it still works…
展开原文
hourly crons eats up too much of my usage
展开原文
Nop, I can do a lot of things with OpenClaw and Hermes and I control everything
查看评论上下文
Openclaw是否已经被ChatGPT关于dots的发布抹杀了? Openclaw的未来会是什么样子?
机器翻译展开原文
Has Openclaw just been wiped out by the announcement from chatGPT regarding dots? What does the future of Openclaw look like now?
展开原文
It 100% can.
查看评论上下文
这肯定是我第1000次看到有人说Claude订阅不能用于OC了。
机器翻译展开原文
This has to be the 1000th time I've seen someone say Claude sub can't be used with OC.
展开原文
dots means you're locked into openai. openclaw still lives in your environment, your persistence. openai dots would need its apps, it's connectors, etc. openclaw let's you build all that. digital sovereignty is still a feature of openclaw, but the difference is definitely dwindling. also, you own your agent files. openai can decide at any point to nerf you and the tasks it can do/allows and you have no control.
展开原文
Its just I used OpenClaw early on when it constantly broke every day but I'm not expecting that from muse
查看评论上下文
Muse可能由OpenClaw驱动,但没关系 我想使用Muse最好的好处是能访问模型和大量的token配额
机器翻译展开原文
Muse is probably powered by OpenClaw but thats okay i suppose the best benefit of using muse will be access to the model and a big token allowance
展开原文
Open claw was too slow for me. Retired.
展开原文
I upgraded from 7.1-2 to OpenClaw 2, it wasn't straight forward but it worked, the latest release fixed all the issues I had when I upgraded so it should be fine for you to upgrade.
展开原文
Anything OpenAI-compatible drops in via a custom base URL, so the real choice is metered tokens vs a flat plan, and if the goal is not watching the wallet, flat is the structural fix: one price, no per-token math.
展开原文
Yes, subscriptions work with OpenClaw.
展开原文
API costs more per unit but you can see and cap exactly what you spend, and honestly most agent steps don't need a flagship model - routing bulk work to a cheap per-token tier (GLM/Qwen flash) is what keeps the bill sane.
展开原文
The catch is metering: consumer plans meter with rolling time windows built for interactive use, and an agent that loops tool calls all day drains a fresh reset in under an hour.
展开原文
What I’ve learned is don’t rely on the GUI and use HTTP or CLI instead. Create a preflight skill to make sure the cluster is stable before running any missions on the local model. I haven’t had time to test it again but using the GUI is ambiguous at best. Loses track of topology and the CLI/HTTP are more authoritative than the GUI.
展开原文
it is true just install/update and login to the claude cli and then run openclaw configure and choose anthropic cli
查看评论上下文
我真的希望这是真的。我想用20欧元的订阅试试,哪怕只是为了运行几次Opus 5.5来修复一些问题。
机器翻译展开原文
I really hope this is true. I want to try with a 20 euro subscription even just to get a couple of runs of Opus 5.5 to bug fix some things.
展开原文
yep, Openclaw had solved the compaction/forgetting issue for a while now. I only refresh a session when I'm in need of deep focus on a new subject.
展开原文
Muse is cool, but the vendor/ecosystem lock-in is serious. Openclaw can take the best ideas Meta implements and replicate them.
展开原文
There are some things that companies would never try/allow that harnesses like openclaw give you the freedom to experiment with.
展开原文
Use two replays. First freeze tool results and state, then rerun only the model. Next freeze the model decisions and replay the harness. The first comparison isolates decision variance; the second exposes transport, permission and checkpoint bugs.
展开原文
It respected two human gates (to approve the research brief and the script) and ran from 11:30 pm till 3:30 am.
查看评论上下文
第一个,也是我用来测试的,是一个多智能体(6个)、多频道的YouTube制作流。我构建它是为了学习如何构建编排模型。我为每个YouTube频道创建一个知识库,使用相同的智能体结构,我可以用相同的提示为任何频道创建视频,只需要调用频道名称。流程大约运行四个小时,生成一份研究简报、一个视频脚本、十个B-roll视频、一打图片和一个投放时间线。主数字虚拟人/旁白目前发送到HeyGen生成(但正在通过添加一台专用PC将其引入ComfyUI)。 这个工作流大约需要4小时运行。QWEN3.6-27B MLX-8bit处理它零掉线。
机器翻译展开原文
The first, and the one that I ran this on as my test, is a multi-agent (6), multi-channel YouTube production stream. I built it to learn how to build an orchestration model. I create a knowledge base for each YouTube channel, and using the same agent structure I can create a video for any channel with the same prompt, just invoking the name of the channel. The process runs about four hours and generates a research brief, a video script, ten b-roll videos, a dozen images, and a placement timeline. The main digital avatar/narrator is sent to HeyGen to produce for now (but is being brought into ComfyUI by adding a PC for this specific task). This workflow takes about 4 hours to run. QWEN3.6-27B MLX-8bit handled it with zero drops.
展开原文
QWEN3.6-27B MLX-8bit handled it with zero drops. It respected two human gates (to approve the research brief and the script) and ran from 11:30 pm till 3:30 am.
展开原文
it’s the most cost effective with a tailscale egress to chromebook connected verizon fios egress
展开原文
exaclty love my claw i am on You are currently on OpenClaw version 2026.4.2 (build d74a122).
展开原文
if i have an issue i just claude code or codex cli to fix the the problem on open claw.
展开原文
People whose claws work fine post rarely, only those who break are vocal. That's not to say that Openclaw is perfect. That's why we encourage all users to submit the issues/PRs to help us identify and fix problems quicker.
展开原文
I'm curious about what makes ppl want to use this software when all I see are posts that an update broke everything they worked hard on...
展开原文
I saw they cut Luna 6 costs in half compared to 5.6. it's so great
展开原文
Telegram/discord delay time is drastically reduced, easier to manage cron, phone app linking, revert message.
查看评论上下文
这样巨大的飞跃中,你注意到了什么变化?
机器翻译展开原文
What are the changes you’ve noticed with that drastic of a jump?
我刚全新安装了9.5版本(我上一个版本是4.26)。9.5相比4.26太好了
机器翻译展开原文
I just did fresh install the 9.5 version (my last version is 4.26). 9.5 is so good compared to 4.26
展开原文
And then i will wait for the most stable release again
展开原文
I had real trouble with upgrades since June. Tried a few times and had to roll back every time.
展开原文
I have also tried hermes and it works pretty well, but I have a lot of time into OpenClaw customizing it for various functions and nothing else I've tried works as well.
展开原文
I had to force my way through the update last night. My database is fairly large at 6 GB. For some reason, the update process makes three copies of the database to ram. I had to increase the ram on my VM to 24 GB and then increase the swap for the update to be able to take place. Very odd process, but I finally got there.
此筛选下暂无评价。