Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Opus 4.6

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-02 14:32 UTC · 2026-09-25 – 2026-10-02 UTC
Experience score56.5/10010 comments in 7 days

RECENT EXPERIENCE

How the Experience Index is changing

Not enough historyvs 7 days ago · points

30 days of rolling 7-day scores at each daily snapshot. The vertical scale adapts to the data. Missing or insufficient samples leave gaps; today is still updating.

No trend available

Hacker News · Not enough opinions · 1 scored comments · Read platform reviews →

ONE MODEL, DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES

Across the communities

Last 7 days

Scored separately for each platform, with different samples and audiences. Platform scores are not simply averaged; scored counts exclude quota-only comments.

Scores range from 0 to 100. Select a platform for its trend and reviews. Latest opinion time is not crawler health.

What people think

One user noted that Claude Opus 4.6 is notorious for token management issues and typically has very low usage caps when accessed through third-party platforms. One user is satisfied with Opus 4.6 for daily development, finding it still adequate.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-02 14:32:03 UTC, Claude Opus 4.6 in the Claude family has 10 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 56.5/100. Available category scores include General text 66.9/100 (n=6). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

1 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

NeutralGeneral text

“Im still fine with Opus 4.6 or 4.8 for daily development”

How's your AI experience today?