← All models

GLM · Last 7 days

GLM 5.3 Flash

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-09-05 14:21 UTC · 2026-08-29 – 2026-09-05 UTC
Community score67.0/100307 comments in 7 days

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

11 selected excerpts

PositiveGeneral text

“just quit bitching and go use GLM 5.3 Flash Super cheap, barely uses tokens, never has congestion issues.”

PositiveSpeed & latency

“GLM 5.3 flash running at 50/60tok/s decode with 2k tok/sec prefill and concurrency of 4 streams at 25-30tok/s decode each”

PositiveCoding

“I use GLM 5.3 Flash and DeepSeek v4 Flash 0731 via one of those places. My use case is programming and some custom workflows for various tools, and it's been great, both price and performance wise.”

PositiveLocal deploy

“GLM-5.3-Flash is pretty much as good as it gets, which you can comfortably run.”

PositiveGeneral text

“I use it as advisor for sol, works fine”

PositiveGeneral text

“GLM manages to consume less tokens and has a higher quality so it wins even though it's marginally expensive”

PositiveCoding

“Feels great, also the normal one and I feel it very solid for programming tasks”

PositiveReasoning

“glm flash 5.3 beats opus 4.6 max thinking”

PositiveSpeed & latency

“glm 5.3 flash, ds 4 flash 0723, qwen 3.8 flash next are all great and should fit. Not sure what the issue is. They are getting closer and closer to sota models, very fast.”

PositiveImage / vision

“GLM 5.3 Flash for design. This combo is so cheap and pretty effective. Not Opus/Fable level but in reality close enough.”

PositiveSafety & refusals

“GLM 5.3 flash on the other hand has been willing to do pretty much anything I ask it, up to and including removing DRM, decompilation, and disassembly.”