I use GLM 5.3 Flash and DeepSeek v4 Flash 0731 via one of those places. My use case is programming and some custom workflows for various tools, and it's been great, both price and performance wise.
glm 5.3 flash, ds 4 flash 0723, qwen 3.8 flash next are all great and should fit. Not sure what the issue is. They are getting closer and closer to sota models, very fast.
GLM 5.3 Flash runs on 256 GB with community weights. Official weights would require to raise the Sparks from 2 to 4 devices. At the current price point, a pill hard to swallow.
GLM 5.3 flash on the other hand has been willing to do pretty much anything I ask it, up to and including removing DRM, decompilation, and disassembly.
社区评论
精选近 7 天的不同意见,摘录条数不代表真实好评比例。
31 条精选摘录
展开原文
just quit bitching and go use GLM 5.3 Flash Super cheap, barely uses tokens, never has congestion issues.
展开原文
GLM 5.3 flash running at 50/60tok/s decode with 2k tok/sec prefill and concurrency of 4 streams at 25-30tok/s decode each
展开原文
I use GLM 5.3 Flash and DeepSeek v4 Flash 0731 via one of those places. My use case is programming and some custom workflows for various tools, and it's been great, both price and performance wise.
展开原文
GLM-5.3-Flash is pretty much as good as it gets, which you can comfortably run.
展开原文
I use it as advisor for sol, works fine
展开原文
GLM manages to consume less tokens and has a higher quality so it wins even though it's marginally expensive
展开原文
GLM 5.3 Flash was slower and more expensive when I tried using it versus Deepseek Flash.
展开原文
Feels great, also the normal one and I feel it very solid for programming tasks
展开原文
GLM-5.3-Flash is priced competitively but tends to hallucinate more for my use case scenarios.
展开原文
glm flash 5.3 beats opus 4.6 max thinking
展开原文
GLM 5.3 Flash (NVFP4) on Hermes tried to delete my Hermes home profile accidentally instead of a sub-folder.
展开原文
glm 5.3 flash, ds 4 flash 0723, qwen 3.8 flash next are all great and should fit. Not sure what the issue is. They are getting closer and closer to sota models, very fast.
展开原文
Because GLM 5.3 Flash is a bit slow at times.
展开原文
Speed feels about the same as GLM 5.3 Flash, so its not some turbo version.
展开原文
GLM 5.3 flash is really bad for my use, i tested it with their free 100m tok
展开原文
GLM 5.3 Flash is crushing benchmarks and is dirt cheap. This interested me so I moved our entire step to it and that was a disastor.
展开原文
GLM 5.3 Flash runs on 256 GB with community weights. Official weights would require to raise the Sparks from 2 to 4 devices. At the current price point, a pill hard to swallow.
展开原文
GLM 5.3 Flash for design. This combo is so cheap and pretty effective. Not Opus/Fable level but in reality close enough.
展开原文
That's max and it didn't work great for my coding tasks in OpenCode.
展开原文
GLM 5.3 Flash which would need 8 to be comfortable there
展开原文
Been using glm 5.3 flash as subagents, i had to switch from max to high cause max overengineers too much
展开原文
GLM 5.3 flash on the other hand has been willing to do pretty much anything I ask it, up to and including removing DRM, decompilation, and disassembly.
展开原文
model thinks its own reasoning is user input
展开原文
Completely bypassing multiple safeguards to stop and ask questions. GLM 5.3-Flash in the last instance was also very wrong.
展开原文
glm flash tried to nuke a bunch of files, im like woahhh hold on
近 7 天暂时没有符合此筛选条件的精选评论。