← All models

GPT · Last 7 days

GPT-6 Sol

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 10:22 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score27.6/100312 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user feels GPT-6.1 Sol is not as good as GPT-6 Sol, indirectly affirming GPT-6 Sol is the better option. One user using GPT-6 Sol finds its generated C++ code is often bloated and not succinct or simple enough for their taste.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 10:42:02 UTC, GPT-6 Sol in the GPT family has 312 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 27.6/100. Available category scores include General text 23.6/100 (n=172); Coding 34.1/100 (n=24); Reasoning 31.4/100 (n=47). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

11 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

PositiveGeneral text

“Feels not as good as 6sol”

Machine translated
Show original

感觉还不如6sol

Comment context
Original post ↗

GPT-6.1 sol 新变化

Machine translated
Show original

GPT-6.1 sol 新变化

PositiveGeneral text

“Now this feels like its the actual Sol 6 that was meant to be.”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

I had the feeling that GPT 6 Sol was actually GTP 6 Terra, it didn't felt as good as Sol, and the benchmarks also showed it was a bit worse than the previous Sol release.

PositiveCoding

“GPT 6 Sol still beat Opus 5.5 on code review”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

In my testing yesterday GPT 6 Sol still beat Opus 5.5 on code review (of GPT written code in this case) 6.1 will probably perform even better.

PositiveUsage limits

“It completely erases my anxiety about the usage limit”

PositiveSpeed & latency

“Put the same bug into Codex to fix, DeepSeek 21 seconds, Sol 58 seconds, both fixed it correctly”

Machine translated
Show original

放进 Codex 里修同一个 bug,DeepSeek 21 秒,Sol 58 秒,两个都修对了

PositiveCoding

“GPT-6 Sol's max effort score is 68.8%, only 1.1 percentage points behind Claude Fable 5's top score of 69.9%, but the per-task cost is about 80% lower”

Machine translated
Show original

GPT-6 Sol 的 max effort 得分为 68.8%,距离 Claude Fable 5 的最高成绩 69.9% 只差 1.1 个百分点,但单任务成本低约 80%

PositiveReasoning

“6 Sol did a better job reviewing and configuring my AWS setup than 5.6 did”

PositiveUsage limits

“I made GPT 6 Sol orchestrate a GPT 6 Luna to implement something on a music player I'm working on, it took around 20 minutes and spent only 1% of my weekly usage.”

PositiveUsage limits

“I can get 72hours or more of usage running both at the same time”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

I’m not understanding the usage issues people are experiencing.

From the same comment ↗

I run codex and chatgpt 24 hours on daybreak high and gpt-6 sol and I can get 72hours or more of usage running both at the same time

PositiveSafety & refusals

“no safeguards observed”

How's your AI experience today?