i got so used to the speed that i basically stopped using other models. now that they no longer offer it, i find myself reaching for a model a lot less
gemma 4 31b and if you have enough ram then qwen next is also a great one(use medium reasoning effort), slightly worse language than 31b but beats it almost everywhere else, very refusal-happy though
社区评论
精选近 7 天的不同意见,摘录条数不代表真实好评比例。
2 条精选摘录
展开原文
the dense Gemma4 model seems by far more able and intelligent
展开原文
Gemma 31B (via API) did very well relative to cost
展开原文
i got so used to the speed that i basically stopped using other models. now that they no longer offer it, i find myself reaching for a model a lot less
展开原文
getting real instantaneous answers is absolutely crazy. A very different feeling and UX.
展开原文
Gemma4 31B is not coding model but it is excellent at intent understanding and task execution used in agentic software
展开原文
Personality wise, Gemma4 31B is one of the best options out there if you still need your model to make tool calls
展开原文
Gemma 31b is so lazy and barely make tool calls even if you prompt it
展开原文
gemma 4 31b and if you have enough ram then qwen next is also a great one(use medium reasoning effort), slightly worse language than 31b but beats it almost everywhere else, very refusal-happy though
展开原文
Gemma 31B are nerfed to the max and ONLY useful for useless crap
展开原文
I've tested their internal Gemma 4 31B model vs my external model, and can say that the internal model works better for analyzing projects
展开原文
with Gemma4 31B and its finetunes/merges the exl3 quants perform very well for me (using 4.5bpw and larger)
近 7 天暂时没有符合此筛选条件的精选评论。