近 7 天 · 通用任务助手
OpenAI Dots
委托任务、调研与成果交付
体感分43.3/1007 条评论
来源 全部
大家怎么看
近 7 天的 7 条评论中,整体体验偏负面。批评最集中在「稳定性」(2/5 条负面摘录)。好评最集中在「价格与额度」(2/3 条正面摘录)。有用户认为体验最好的智能体(Dots/GrokBot)都具备真正能操作电脑、界面友好、可通过手机审批的功能。有用户表示体验过的Dots/GrokBot等智能体虽能使用电脑、界面好、支持手机审批,但价格过高,因此自建了Pennant。
用户反馈
8 条评价摘录
展开原文
The best agent experiences I tried (Dots/ GrokBot) all had an agent that can actually use your computer, a nice interface, a way to approving things from your phone. They were also outrageously expensive, so I built Pennant.
展开原文
The best agent experiences I tried (Dots/ GrokBot) all had an agent that can actually use your computer, a nice interface, a way to approving things from your phone.
展开原文
The worst part isn’t the timeouts, it’s when Dot says something is done and it isn’t, because you can’t spot that kind of mistake. Have it show proof before calling anything finished.
展开原文
I think one good point of Dots is that it runs on unlimited Astra (unless it is working coding or doing snything). I’ve been chating and planning with it all day without losing any usage.
展开原文
chatgpt dots entered answer filenames differently and verifier marked 3/5 but dots marked it as complete.
展开原文
Dots is for people who want to have some of the tech, without the knowledge of the tech. It's meant for the general public. If you are tech savvy enough to use Hermes, then Dots isn't for you.
展开原文
It still have some bugs i guess, i am trying to update Dot's Avatar, it could not letting me for some reasons !
展开原文
Conversations with your dot don’t count toward your ChatGPT usage limits. When you ask your dot to start or manage tasks in Codex or ChatGPT Work, those tasks count toward your usage limits as usual.
此筛选下暂无评价。