← All models

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Opus 5.5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 10:37 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score81.1/100972 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user feels Claude often responds in a hard-to-condense dense way, but Opus 5.5 is a little better at giving more normal, human-like responses. One user reports Opus 5.5 refused requests, but in one case explaining it was a game made it comply.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 10:42:02 UTC, Claude Opus 5.5 in the Claude family has 972 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 81.1/100. Available category scores include General text 78.7/100 (n=362); Coding 83.7/100 (n=106); Reasoning 89.0/100 (n=287). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

4 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

NegativeReasoning

“made a very simple mistake, and another simple mistake, again”

NegativeReasoning

“outright ignores what the user has stated as facts and doesn't ask when those dont align”

NeutralReasoning

“This is indeed impressive — the algorithm research that Claude came up with itself does seem to have some genuinely new stuff”

Machine translated
Show original

这个确实牛逼在, Claude 整出来的这个算法研究本身,看起来确实有些新东西

MixedReasoning

“Opus is clearly better in logic and processing steps, but often skips some or does something else entirely”

How's your AI experience today?