← All models

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Opus 5.5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 10:37 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score81.1/100972 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user feels Claude often responds in a hard-to-condense dense way, but Opus 5.5 is a little better at giving more normal, human-like responses. One user reports Opus 5.5 refused requests, but in one case explaining it was a game made it comply.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 10:42:02 UTC, Claude Opus 5.5 in the Claude family has 972 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 81.1/100. Available category scores include General text 78.7/100 (n=362); Coding 83.7/100 (n=106); Reasoning 89.0/100 (n=287). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

6 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

PositiveGeneral text

“Opus 5.5 is a little better at normal responses though lol”

Comment context
From the same comment ↗

While I understand what it’s saying, a lot of the times it says things in such a dense way where a human could condense / simplify the meaning so i don’t have to spend all my brainpower understanding the sentence and actually get to the logic/problem lmfao.

NegativeGeneral text

“Astra and Opus 5.5 are great, but even what they make might not even be worthy the lowest tier indie games.”

NegativeGeneral text

“Opus 5.0 and 5.5 (still) feel more like steering dependant”

NeutralGeneral text

“Agent rules are more strongly adhered to than claude.mds are at least with Opus 5.5”

MixedGeneral text

“Sure, Opus 5.5 benchmarks better than Fable. Sure. But is that the model, or is that the RL for agentic work?”

How's your AI experience today?