← All models

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Opus 5.5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 10:37 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score81.1/100972 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user feels Claude often responds in a hard-to-condense dense way, but Opus 5.5 is a little better at giving more normal, human-like responses. One user reports Opus 5.5 refused requests, but in one case explaining it was a game made it comply.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 10:42:02 UTC, Claude Opus 5.5 in the Claude family has 972 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 81.1/100. Available category scores include General text 78.7/100 (n=362); Coding 83.7/100 (n=106); Reasoning 89.0/100 (n=287). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

6 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

PositiveUsage limits

“I get about the same amount of usage with opus 5.5 on the claude 20$ sub as I get with astra on the 200$ plan. very worth switching.”

NegativeUsage limits

“I can run Claude Opus 5.5 on x high for 12 hours and burn 12% of my week”

NegativeUsage limits

“Opus 5.5 + Fable 5.1 on a $200 plan/heavy workload/single task eats about 15%/day”

How's your AI experience today?