← All models

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Opus 5.5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 10:37 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score81.1/100972 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user feels Claude often responds in a hard-to-condense dense way, but Opus 5.5 is a little better at giving more normal, human-like responses. One user reports Opus 5.5 refused requests, but in one case explaining it was a game made it comply.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 10:42:02 UTC, Claude Opus 5.5 in the Claude family has 972 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 81.1/100. Available category scores include General text 78.7/100 (n=362); Coding 83.7/100 (n=106); Reasoning 89.0/100 (n=287). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

5 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

MixedGeneral text

“Sure, Opus 5.5 benchmarks better than Fable. Sure. But is that the model, or is that the RL for agentic work?”

MixedCoding

“Opus 5.5 (I use it for work writing C#) seems faster than Opus 5, but it doesn't seem demonstrably better to my eyes and is still prone to word vomit”

MixedReasoning

“Opus is clearly better in logic and processing steps, but often skips some or does something else entirely”

MixedLocal deploy

“Opus 5.5 provides the smoothest LLM experience i ever had, but it did one very odd thing where my macbook ram went full and i had to restart the machine to continue”

How's your AI experience today?