← All models

Claude · Last 7 days

Claude Opus 5.5

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-10-01 10:37 UTC · 2026-09-24 – 2026-10-01 UTC
Experience score81.1/100972 comments in 7 days

What people think

One user feels Claude often responds in a hard-to-condense dense way, but Opus 5.5 is a little better at giving more normal, human-like responses. One user reports Opus 5.5 refused requests, but in one case explaining it was a game made it comply.

About the sample and scores

As of 2026-10-01 10:42:02 UTC, Claude Opus 5.5 in the Claude family has 972 explicitly attributed community comments in the last 7 days; its community score is 81.1/100. Available category scores include General text 78.7/100 (n=362); Coding 83.7/100 (n=106); Reasoning 89.0/100 (n=287). Scoring method and sources

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

4 selected excerpts

Community reports about limits cannot establish official allowances.

NeutralGeneral text

“Agent rules are more strongly adhered to than claude.mds are at least with Opus 5.5”

NeutralSafety & refusals

“claude opus 5.5 in VS code extension does not”

Comment context
Original post ↗

As of the latest update, I cannot even get Opus 5.5 to create a fictional user in my test database to test the login UI because it refuses to handle password inputs altogether.

NeutralReasoning

“This is indeed impressive — the algorithm research that Claude came up with itself does seem to have some genuinely new stuff”

Machine translated
Show original

这个确实牛逼在, Claude 整出来的这个算法研究本身,看起来确实有些新东西

How's your AI experience today?