← All models

GLM · Last 7 days

GLM 5.3 Flash

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-09-05 14:21 UTC · 2026-08-29 – 2026-09-05 UTC
Community score67.0/100307 comments in 7 days

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

6 selected excerpts

PositiveSpeed & latency

“GLM 5.3 flash running at 50/60tok/s decode with 2k tok/sec prefill and concurrency of 4 streams at 25-30tok/s decode each”

NegativeSpeed & latency

“GLM 5.3 Flash was slower and more expensive when I tried using it versus Deepseek Flash.”

PositiveSpeed & latency

“glm 5.3 flash, ds 4 flash 0723, qwen 3.8 flash next are all great and should fit. Not sure what the issue is. They are getting closer and closer to sota models, very fast.”

NegativeSpeed & latency

“Because GLM 5.3 Flash is a bit slow at times.”

NeutralSpeed & latency

“Speed feels about the same as GLM 5.3 Flash, so its not some turbo version.”

MixedSpeed & latency

“Although it's slow, the activity duration is long enough, and the concurrency isn't particularly stingy. Currently it seems fine to handle several hundred million per night, and the entire activity lifecycle can support up to a billion, which is quite generous”

ZhihuzhMachine translated
Show original

虽然慢但活动时间足够长,并发也不是特别抠 目前看一晚几个亿没问题,整个活动生命周期最多可以蹬百亿,相当大方了