← All models

GLM · Last 7 days

GLM 5.3 Flash

0–100 · higher means more positive community experience, not benchmark performance.

Updated 2026-09-05 14:21 UTC · 2026-08-29 – 2026-09-05 UTC
Community score67.0/100307 comments in 7 days

Community reviews

Selected comments from the last 7 days. The balance of excerpts does not represent the share of positive reviews.

7 selected excerpts

PositiveGeneral text

“just quit bitching and go use GLM 5.3 Flash Super cheap, barely uses tokens, never has congestion issues.”

PositiveGeneral text

“I use it as advisor for sol, works fine”

PositiveGeneral text

“GLM manages to consume less tokens and has a higher quality so it wins even though it's marginally expensive”

NegativeGeneral text

“GLM 5.3 flash is really bad for my use, i tested it with their free 100m tok”

NegativeGeneral text

“GLM 5.3 Flash is crushing benchmarks and is dirt cheap. This interested me so I moved our entire step to it and that was a disastor.”

NeutralGeneral text

“GLM 5.3 Flash is not fast, but low-cost. It's not suitable for direct human interaction because it thinks for a long time, even slower than glm5.3 locally. It's more suitable for being called by gateways like Xiaolongxia or Hermes to do specific tasks. And GLM 5.3 Flash is the cheapest, no need for tokenplan.”

ZhihuzhMachine translated
Show original

GLM 5.3flash 不是快速,而是低成本 他不适合直接和人交互, 因为一次思考老半天,比 glm5.3 本地还慢 他比较适合 被小龙虾或者 hermes这种网关调用去干具体的活 而且GLM 5.3flash 是最便宜的,都不用 tokenplan

MixedGeneral text

“Been using glm 5.3 flash as subagents, i had to switch from max to high cause max overengineers too much”