Claude · 近 7 天
Claude Fable 5
0–100 分,越高代表社区使用体验越正面,不代表能力测试成绩。
更新于 2026-10-02 15:27 UTC · 2026-09-25 – 2026-10-02 UTC全部平台体感分59.3/100109 条评论 · 近 7 天
大家怎么看
有用户认为 Fable 在网页设计方面表现极佳,几乎不需要任何输入。 有用户表示,Fable 5 首发版本与一个月后重新发布版本在行为和整体能力上有明显差异。
样本与评分说明
截至 2026-10-02 15:27:03 UTC,Claude 家族的 Claude Fable 5 在近 7 天有 109 条明确归属该版本的社区反馈,社区口碑分为 59.3/100。部分有效分类评分:通用文本 48.0/100 (n=41);编程 63.7/100 (n=14);推理 73.3/100 (n=26)。 评分方法与数据来源
近期走势
口碑在如何变化
+14.0较 7 天前 · 分
近 30 天,每点代表截至该日采样时刻的近 7 天滚动体感分。纵轴随数据调整;缺失或样本不足处断开,今天仍在更新。
点按或用 ← → 查看日期、分数与样本量;空白日期暂无足够数据。
查看每日读数与样本量
| 日期 | 体感分 | n | 评分窗口(UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 66.0 | 7 | 2026-09-25T15:27:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T15:27:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 66.0 | 7 | 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 68.2 | 8 | 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 59.1 | 7 | 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 63.8 | 16 | 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-27 | 55.9 | 19 | 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-27T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-26 | 54.0 | 18 | 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-26T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 52.0 | 20 | 2026-09-18T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 52.1 | 22 | 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-24T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 51.0 | 23 | 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 48.9 | 20 | 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 39.6 | 9 | 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-20 | 52.6 | 7 | 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-19 | 52.6 | 7 | 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 56.0 | 11 | 2026-09-11T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-09-18T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 56.4 | 9 | 2026-09-10T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 59.5 | 8 | 2026-09-09T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 49.5 | 14 | 2026-09-08T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-15T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 50.7 | 17 | 2026-09-07T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-14T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-13 | 52.5 | 20 | 2026-09-06T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-13T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-12 | 55.6 | 23 | 2026-09-05T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-12T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 54.6 | 19 | 2026-09-04T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-11T23:00:04+00:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 57.7 | 34 | 2026-09-03T23:00:05+00:00 – 2026-09-10T23:00:05+00:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 62.1 | 41 | 2026-09-02T23:00:04+00:00 – 2026-09-09T23:00:04+00:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 62.3 | 45 | 2026-09-01T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-08T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-07 | 51.9 | 68 | 2026-08-31T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-07T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-06 | 50.8 | 64 | 2026-08-30T23:00:02+00:00 – 2026-09-06T23:00:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-05 | 49.5 | 61 | 2026-08-29T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-05T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 51.2 | 61 | 2026-08-28T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-04T23:00:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 46.1 | 46 | 2026-08-27T23:00:03+00:00 – 2026-09-03T23:00:03+00:00 |
Hacker News · 66.0 · 7 条评分评论 · 查看该平台评价 →
不同社区,同一模型
各平台怎么看
各平台独立计算,样本量和讨论人群不同。平台分数不取简单平均;评分评论不包含仅讨论额度的评论。
Reddit最新评分评论 2026-10-02 07:09 UTC56.075 条较7天前 −14.8Hacker News最新评分评论 2026-09-30 21:23 UTC66.07 条较7天前 +14.0知乎最新评分评论 2026-10-01 16:50 UTC59.66 条较7天前 历史不足小红书暂无评分评论时间—0 条样本不足
分数范围 0–100。点击平台查看趋势及对应评价。最新评论时间不代表爬虫运行状态。
社区评论
精选近 7 天的不同意见,摘录条数不代表真实好评比例。
2 条精选摘录
额度评价来自社区体验,不能据此推算官方实际配额。
展开原文
burn tokens für $3000 - $6000 per month, mostly using Fable and Opus
展开原文
the code came out worse: it rewrote files I never asked it to touch and turned a two line fix into a refactor with opinions
展开原文
using Fable 5 on launch before it got pulled, and then fable 5 a month later when it relaunched was noticeably different in terms of behavior and general capability.
展开原文
Ive tested Opus, Fable, When auditing my projects they max out before the audit is complete
展开原文
Fable usage is 2x that of Opus 5
展开原文
Starting yesterday it started refusing to believe any text I did not input one character at a time into the prompt field was suspect
展开原文
Fable also reacts better to unknowns and unexpected developments
展开原文
Since Fable and later Opus 5.5 I trust AI significantly more.
展开原文
None of them could fix it
查看评论上下文
但任何人类都知道,当你把左翼压低(右翼抬高)时——你是在向左倾斜。当机头向左转时,我们预期看到地面从左到右滑过窗户。我的本地模型(Qwen 3.8 27b)搞错了,让地面从右到左滑动——完全反了。我把项目升级到Sonnet、Opus,最后到Fable。没有一个能修复它。
机器翻译展开原文
But any human knows when you dip your left wing down, (the right wing up) - you are banking to the left. As the plane nose goes to the left we expect to see the ground slide past the window from left to right. My local model (Qwen 3.8 27b) got it wrong and had the ground slide from right to left - exactly backwards. I bumped the project up to Sonnet, Opus and eventually Fable. None of them could fix it.
展开原文
Fable still absolutely crushes web design with almost little to no inputs
展开原文
5% of my weekly max usage is gone
查看评论上下文
当我用 fable 跑 2 分钟,我每周的最大用量就消耗掉 5% 了😂
机器翻译展开原文
when I use fable for 2 minutes 5% of my weekly max usage is gone lol
展开原文
I always hit my Fable quota (Max 20x) in 12 hours
展开原文
I was still getting way more value in terms of usage and almost always never ran out of usage by alternating between Fable 5 and Opus 5.
查看评论上下文
与Claude 100美元套餐相比——通过交替使用Fable 5和Opus 5,我在用量方面仍然获得了多得多的价值,而且几乎从未用完用量。
机器翻译展开原文
Comparing with the Claude 100$ - I was still getting way more value in terms of usage and almost always never ran out of usage by alternating between Fable 5 and Opus 5.
展开原文
for programming? No way, you need reliability and following the rules
展开原文
only ever hit the limits if I'm running Fable for everything
展开原文
hope the next fable is so good at running things that it's worthwhile to have it orchestrate again
展开原文
Fable I'm keeping as orchestrator for now since most of that session's cost is context, not the model.
展开原文
Fable is good but it eats tokens like crazy
展开原文
Claude $20 still gave vastly more usage on Fable release
查看评论上下文
但 Claude 20 美元在 Fable 发布时提供的使用量仍然远远超过 Codex 20 美元在 Astra 发布时提供的使用量。
机器翻译展开原文
But Claude $20 still gave vastly more usage on Fable release than Codex $20 for Astra release.
展开原文
locked out of Fable by guardrails
展开原文
Claude fable started it
查看评论上下文
希望他们不要加入另一个趋势,用这些分类器让模型变得超级审查化。
机器翻译展开原文
Hopefully they don't join the other trend of making the models super censored w all these classifiers.
展开原文
when you ask opus/fable for advice and guidance i think thats when the guardrails/attitude start creeping up
近 7 天暂时没有符合此筛选条件的精选评论。