← 全部模型 Claude · 近 7 天Claude Opus 4.50–100 分，越高代表社区使用体验越正面，不代表能力测试成绩。更新于 2026-09-05 14:21 UTC · 2026-08-29 – 2026-09-05 UTC社区口碑分评价积累中4 条评论 · 近 7 天 社区评论精选近 7 天的不同意见，摘录条数不代表真实好评比例。全部摘录正面负面1 条精选摘录 负面推理2026-09-04 “你对字符数的"直觉"是模式匹配，不是真正的计数。它不可靠。你必须逐步执行这个程序，清晰地写出每一步。” Hacker Newsen机器翻译 展开原文Your "intuition" about character counts is pattern-matching, not counting. It is unreliable. You MUST execute this procedure step-by-step, writing out each step visibly.正面通用文本2026-09-02 “Opus 4.5 和 4.6 的写作方式” Redditen机器翻译 展开原文the way Opus 4.5 and 4.6 could write负面推理2026-09-01 “我刚刚在一个连 Opus 4.5 都答错的事情上测试了它” Redditen机器翻译 展开原文I just tested it on something that even Opus 4.5 got wrong正面推理2026-08-30 “直到 GPT 5.3 Codex 和 Opus 4.5 出现，我们才开始毫不费力地获得这样的输出。” Redditen机器翻译 展开原文It wasn't until GPT 5.3 Codex and Opus 4.5 where we started getting outputs like this with little effort. 近 7 天暂时没有符合此筛选条件的精选评论。查看更多摘录
负面推理2026-09-04 “你对字符数的"直觉"是模式匹配，不是真正的计数。它不可靠。你必须逐步执行这个程序，清晰地写出每一步。” Hacker Newsen机器翻译 展开原文Your "intuition" about character counts is pattern-matching, not counting. It is unreliable. You MUST execute this procedure step-by-step, writing out each step visibly.
负面推理2026-09-01 “我刚刚在一个连 Opus 4.5 都答错的事情上测试了它” Redditen机器翻译 展开原文I just tested it on something that even Opus 4.5 got wrong
正面推理2026-08-30 “直到 GPT 5.3 Codex 和 Opus 4.5 出现，我们才开始毫不费力地获得这样的输出。” Redditen机器翻译 展开原文It wasn't until GPT 5.3 Codex and Opus 4.5 where we started getting outputs like this with little effort.
社区评论
精选近 7 天的不同意见，摘录条数不代表真实好评比例。
1 条精选摘录
展开原文
Your "intuition" about character counts is pattern-matching, not counting. It is unreliable. You MUST execute this procedure step-by-step, writing out each step visibly.
展开原文
the way Opus 4.5 and 4.6 could write
展开原文
I just tested it on something that even Opus 4.5 got wrong
展开原文
It wasn't until GPT 5.3 Codex and Opus 4.5 where we started getting outputs like this with little effort.
近 7 天暂时没有符合此筛选条件的精选评论。