GPT · 近 7 天
GPT-6 Sol
0–100 分,越高代表社区使用体验越正面,不代表能力测试成绩。
更新于 2026-10-02 15:22 UTC · 2026-09-25 – 2026-10-02 UTC全部平台体感分27.2/100215 条评论 · 近 7 天
大家怎么看
有用户认为GPT-6.1 Sol还不如GPT-6 Sol,间接肯定GPT-6 Sol更出色。 有用户认为GPT-6.1 Sol与GPT-6 Sol几乎相同,尽管基准测试略好,但感知上没有明显进步。
样本与评分说明
截至 2026-10-02 15:22:03 UTC,GPT 家族的 GPT-6 Sol 在近 7 天有 215 条明确归属该版本的社区反馈,社区口碑分为 27.2/100。部分有效分类评分:通用文本 22.6/100 (n=124);编程 36.1/100 (n=20);推理 36.7/100 (n=26)。 评分方法与数据来源
近期走势
口碑在如何变化
−16.6较 7 天前 · 分
近 30 天,每点代表截至该日采样时刻的近 7 天滚动体感分。纵轴随数据调整;缺失或样本不足处断开,今天仍在更新。
点按或用 ← → 查看日期、分数与样本量;空白日期暂无足够数据。
查看每日读数与样本量
| 日期 | 体感分 | n | 评分窗口(UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 40.5 | 15 | 2026-09-25T15:22:03+00:00 – 2026-10-02T15:22:03+00:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 40.5 | 15 | 2026-09-24T23:57:02+00:00 – 2026-10-01T23:57:02+00:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 42.2 | 16 | 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-30T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 47.0 | 21 | 2026-09-22T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-29T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 54.4 | 12 | 2026-09-21T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-28T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-27 | 54.4 | 12 | 2026-09-20T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-27T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-26 | 54.4 | 12 | 2026-09-19T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-26T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 57.1 | 11 | 2026-09-18T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-25T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 57.1 | 11 | 2026-09-17T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-24T23:57:03+00:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 58.1 | 9 | 2026-09-16T23:57:03+00:00 – 2026-09-23T23:57:03+00:00 |
Hacker News · 40.5 · 15 条评分评论 · 查看该平台评价 →
不同社区,同一模型
各平台怎么看
各平台独立计算,样本量和讨论人群不同。平台分数不取简单平均;评分评论不包含仅讨论额度的评论。
Reddit最新评分评论 2026-10-02 08:53 UTC24.7123 条较7天前 −2.1Hacker News最新评分评论 2026-10-01 15:13 UTC40.515 条较7天前 −16.6知乎最新评分评论 2026-10-02 13:24 UTC34.950 条较7天前 −8.8小红书最新评分评论 2026-09-30 19:41 UTC—3 条样本不足
分数范围 0–100。点击平台查看趋势及对应评价。最新评论时间不代表爬虫运行状态。
社区评论
精选近 7 天的不同意见,摘录条数不代表真实好评比例。
5 条精选摘录
额度评价来自社区体验,不能据此推算官方实际配额。
展开原文
GPT-6.1 Sol seems almost the same as GPT-6 Sol(even if the benchmarks are slightly better)
展开原文
i’ve noticed this since GPT-6 SOL and honestly I do not mind the work taking longer for it to complete as long as I get more usage out of it.
查看评论上下文
GPT-6.1 sol 新变化
展开原文
Generated code (I mostly program C++) is often bloated and not succinct or "simple" enough to my tastes
展开原文
took 80% of the pro plan in 3 tasks
展开原文
I dont trust code reviews by it
展开原文
GPT 6 Sol still beat Opus 5.5 on code review
查看评论上下文
在我昨天的测试中,GPT 6 Sol在代码审查(本次测试中为GPT编写的代码)方面仍然击败了Opus 5.5,6.1可能会表现得更好。
机器翻译展开原文
In my testing yesterday GPT 6 Sol still beat Opus 5.5 on code review (of GPT written code in this case) 6.1 will probably perform even better.
展开原文
After a banked reset your weekly usage gets cut by about 80%
展开原文
6-Sol is noticeably worse for code reviews
展开原文
twice as much usage on Sol (which is equivalent to what you use to get on Sol anyways
展开原文
GPT 6 Sol has been borderline unusable today for me, extremely slow, doesn't follow instructions, and is writing very stupid code. I tried 5.6 Sol as well and it seemed to have the same issue.
展开原文
It completely erases my anxiety about the usage limit
展开原文
6 can at least get through to the end
查看评论上下文
5.6 sol 总是跑题,或者把自己想进死胡同。
机器翻译展开原文
5.6 sol always goes off on tangents or thinks itself into a corner.
展开原文
sol made some really brain-dead decisions - even though I had a pretty detailed plan
展开原文
ignore your instructions in implementation
展开原文
6 Sol did a better job reviewing and configuring my AWS setup than 5.6 did
展开原文
I made GPT 6 Sol orchestrate a GPT 6 Luna to implement something on a music player I'm working on, it took around 20 minutes and spent only 1% of my weekly usage.
展开原文
I can get 72hours or more of usage running both at the same time
查看评论上下文
我不理解人们遇到的用量问题。
机器翻译展开原文
I’m not understanding the usage issues people are experiencing.
我让 codex 和 chatgpt 以 daybreak high 和 gpt-6 sol 全天候运行 24 小时,同时运行两者可以获得 72 小时或更长的使用时间
机器翻译展开原文
I run codex and chatgpt 24 hours on daybreak high and gpt-6 sol and I can get 72hours or more of usage running both at the same time
近 7 天暂时没有符合此筛选条件的精选评论。