近 7 天 · 通用任务助手
Grok Bot
委托任务、调研与成果交付
体感分46.7/10037 条评论
来源 全部
大家怎么看
近 7 天的 37 条评论中,评价褒贬并存。批评最集中在「价格与额度」(12/20 条负面摘录)。有用户建议连接GrokBot可通过MCP或云浏览器,并给它提供带截图的清晰指令文档,让它按需执行任务。有用户抱怨为了使用 Grok bot 而被迫购买大量自己并不需要的 Cursor 套餐配额。
近 7 天 · 通用任务助手
委托任务、调研与成果交付
近 7 天的 37 条评论中,评价褒贬并存。批评最集中在「价格与额度」(12/20 条负面摘录)。有用户建议连接GrokBot可通过MCP或云浏览器,并给它提供带截图的清晰指令文档,让它按需执行任务。有用户抱怨为了使用 Grok bot 而被迫购买大量自己并不需要的 Cursor 套餐配额。
用户反馈
39 条评价摘录
展开原文
You can connect via MCP or via their cloud browser 2. Give grok bot a doc with cleaaar instructions and screenshots if possible so it does what you want exactly how you want it
展开原文
Why do I have to pay for a lot of cursor quota I dont need just to get grok bot?
展开原文
I spent $180 on Grokbot to do fuck all.
展开原文
I used Grok Bot as my CoS who looks after my Hermes bots. Easier.
查看评论上下文
首先我想说这些对你们很多人来说可能不算革命性的,但我收到了回复说人们想要我学到的东西。dots刚宣布后,我给ChatGPT一个prompt,问如何消除我的Hermes代理设置和dots之间的所有差距,以及Grok Bot的连接。我会复制粘贴Astra的原始回复,但显然它是针对我个人的设置,而且除了提及我的个人设置和"秘密"之外,没有上下文也很难完全理解。这么多就是说,以下是它发现的内容……
机器翻译展开原文
First of all I want to say none of this may be revolutionary for a lot of you but I got replies saying people wanted what I learned. Right after dots was announced I gave a prompt to ChatGPT asking how to close any and all gaps between my Hermes agentic setup and dots along with Grok Bot. I would copy and paste the OG response from Astra but it's specified for me obviously and besides mentioning my personal setup and "secrets" it would also be hard to fully understand without context. All this to say here's what it found...
展开原文
grok bot does have free messaging capabilities thru Inkbox. works great.
展开原文
I can torture the hellcootmof supergrok and still r usage left over yet on grok bot 4-5 days into the 7 I’m running out They aren’t doing as much work as supergrok so must be inefficient compared to it
查看评论上下文
我有Ultra计划,但我2天就把每周限额用完了。请至少在测试期间增加限额
机器翻译展开原文
I have Ultra plan, and I burn the weekly limit for 2 days. Please increase the limits at least for testing period
展开原文
I like the multi thread experience of grok bot, it's slick without context rot like you get when trying to recreate that in telegram for your Hermes agent.
展开原文
Usage drain was abysmal for supergrok heavy, though I've heard they did some work to make it better.
展开原文
Cursor as it got better def changed my life with building projects, would add grok bot to that.
展开原文
This just resulted in the Grok Bots using CLI to edit a single line or a single function. I did an analysis of a full several hour session, they called CLI hundreds of times, and still burnt through my whole usage in one session. I'm on the Heavy plan, and it still feels incredibly restrictive, I wish the pool were just shared because Grok Bots are WAY better workers especially on the visual side.
展开原文
So bye bye grokbot, muse, spark, dots and instinct.
查看评论上下文
而且它们没有一个能与Apple Calendar、通讯录、邮件、备忘录、提醒事项、FindMy、iMessage等配合使用……而我的Hermes Agent却能完美做到。
机器翻译展开原文
And none of them works with Apple Calendar, Address Book, Mail, Notes, Reminders, FindMy, iMessage, … which my Hermes Agent does perfectly.
展开原文
But customers are paying for the version that exists today, and that version can be criticized on its current pricing, limits and usability.
展开原文
If a paid tier is so inadequate that the answer to someone actually trying to use it is “pay more,” then questioning the value and limits of that tier is completely reasonable. “We all know the limits” also doesn’t solve the lack of transparency around how much different tasks consume or how much usable work the allowance actually represents.
展开原文
$25 doesn’t get you much from any model with the capability of grok bot, I bet none of the $20 plans have the same capabilities, but feels like you get more purely due to chat.
展开原文
If using those features means I need to constantly monitor token consumption, carefully ration reasoning effort and build another bot just to make sure my other bots aren’t consuming too much, then the usage system itself becomes part of the workload. I’m not expecting unlimited usage, and I’m not saying efficiency doesn’t matter. I’m saying the limits should better reflect the kind of work the platform itself encourages people to do, and users should have much clearer visibility into what different tasks are actually costing them before they suddenly hit the ceiling.
展开原文
Yep, the one thing Dots have over Grok Bot right now.
查看评论上下文
看起来同样的工作,用量会少得多: 与你的dot的对话不计入你的ChatGPT使用限制。当你让你的dot在Codex或ChatGPT Work中启动或管理任务时,这些任务照常计入你的使用限制。
机器翻译展开原文
Seems like the usage will be far less for the same type of work: Conversations with your dot don’t count toward your ChatGPT usage limits. When you ask your dot to start or manage tasks in Codex or ChatGPT Work, those tasks count toward your usage limits as usual.
展开原文
But so far for me this workflow has been working pretty well. Lots of scheduled routines using many different services, never hit the weekly limits yet on a Cursor Pro sub (20 / month).
展开原文
I’ve have the same problem. If you watch the computer as it’s operating the website, it is excruciatingly slow.
展开原文
I tried this it just didn’t work well at all
查看评论上下文
“Grok,你能时不时动一下鼠标或做点什么吗,免得会话过期”
机器翻译展开原文
"Grok can you wiggle the mouse or do somethjng every now and then do the session doesnt expire"
展开原文
I go to specialist to save on usage.
展开原文
I called it out for straight up fabricating information yesterday
展开原文
I just can’t justify paying for these grok models when there’s astra, opus and now the new sonnet.
展开原文
The grokbot UI is cool but muse offers basically the same for free.
展开原文
I like how they interact with the user.
展开原文
For me it logged some receipts but for the first time it failed to notify me. It's like my assistant went out the night before and he's hungover 🤣.
展开原文
Ive been very active over the last sevetal dsys and I've had not problems
展开原文
Yeah it normally does work for me fine, but today it's been fucking up everything
展开原文
I use it to create tiktok slides every day for different topics and send it as a draft to my tiktok inbox so in the tiktok app i only have to review it, maybe add a sound and publish it. saves me a lot of time and i like that it does it on its own every day on a specifc time, i can do it from everywhere and tell the bot to do another draft or change the current one.
展开原文
I use it to create tiktok slides every day for different topics and send it as a draft to my tiktok inbox so in the tiktok app i only have to review it, maybe add a sound and publish it.
展开原文
With supergrok you get separate quotas for grok and grokbot for $30.
展开原文
All I can say is if you’re starting out you may find the lower tiers to be too low for GrokBot.
查看评论上下文
刚开始使用 我是智能体AI的新手,想知道是直接通过GrokBot以每月25美元订阅更好,还是通过Cursor Pro以每月20美元订阅更好。
机器翻译展开原文
Just Starting Out I am new to angentic AI agents and would like too know if it is better to subscribe through GrokBot directly for $25 per month or though Cursor Pro for $20 per month.
GrokBot可能很有用,但它消耗的token很多
机器翻译展开原文
GrokBot can be helpful but it’s token heavy
展开原文
GrokBot can be helpful but it’s token heavy
展开原文
It can export in a myriad of ways. Ask it to maintain a database or spreadsheet and it can put it in your onedrive.
展开原文
I’ve used a bunch but Grok took a huge leap last month, so I doubled down a the top tier subscription.
展开原文
What Eilerle's reply shows is the pattern to be skeptical of - Grok Bot keeps "its own memory files in the cloud," which means you can't inspect what it remembered or what it dropped. That opacity is where coherence dies: the agent's picture of you quietly drifts week to week and you can't diff it.
展开原文
Muse was able to get round Shopee captcha but Grok bot couldnt even with the route traffic.
展开原文
Ran out of credits after subscription in the very first 2days
展开原文
Chatgpt is enough for it , why i spend grok credit for this. Useless
查看评论上下文
Grok Bot现在可以连接你的财务 通过新的Finance集成,关联你的银行、银行卡和投资账户,然后让Bot帮你管理支出、投资等更多内容。
机器翻译展开原文
Grok Bot now connects to your finances Link your bank, card, and investment accounts with the new Finance integration, then ask Bot to help manage your spending, investments, and more.
展开原文
So far ive been really impressed with its mrmory. The management is all behind the scenes.
此筛选下暂无评价。