Compared to other AIs, after this update and the arrival of GLM-5.3, it has a very aggressive security protocol. Anything I ask her to do or create, she gives off a completely distorted view, saying that it's dangerous and could cause risk
Worth the money for me, I got their Max plan, orchestrate planning with glm 5.3, small and implementing things are flash, also I got extra claude max for fable only for review. Shit just run
GLM 5.3 is truly the GOAT for me right now, I had a large project that both GPT and Claude completely shat the bed in, and I just got the 300mil tokens claim and YOLOd zcode on the project.
Full GLM 5.3 (not Flash) on Max reasoning falls somewhere between GPT 5.6 Terra-High and Sol-High in my (coding) use.
I let it daily-drive and use Sol to check plans. Helps usage stretch far for me.
I do find it unnecessary for the model to referencing time so much in its outputs but it does flow in my experience so it hasnt really been a negative quirk
社区评论
精选近 7 天的不同意见,摘录条数不代表真实好评比例。
9 条精选摘录
展开原文
Only found out when I plugged it in GLM-5.3 to troubleshoot. Thanks for the script, it works great.
展开原文
warm up context with non-RE things with American models > switch to GLM 5.3 with actual request, let it fill context with some RE work
展开原文
Compared to other AIs, after this update and the arrival of GLM-5.3, it has a very aggressive security protocol. Anything I ask her to do or create, she gives off a completely distorted view, saying that it's dangerous and could cause risk
展开原文
I can actually have 16 GLM 5.3 agents running concurrently at the same time.
展开原文
Worth the money for me, I got their Max plan, orchestrate planning with glm 5.3, small and implementing things are flash, also I got extra claude max for fable only for review. Shit just run
展开原文
GLM 5.3 is truly the GOAT for me right now, I had a large project that both GPT and Claude completely shat the bed in, and I just got the 300mil tokens claim and YOLOd zcode on the project.
展开原文
Run glm 5.3 dsv4 flash etc you can parallel like 4 agents at least
展开原文
just use glm 5.3 now which perfectly fits
展开原文
one shotted this with GLM 5.3
展开原文
GLM 5.3 on same level in dev work as SOL for me. Sometimes even better. I'm using SOL for roadmap/tasks, then GLM audit on them and real work.
展开原文
Full GLM 5.3 (not Flash) on Max reasoning falls somewhere between GPT 5.6 Terra-High and Sol-High in my (coding) use. I let it daily-drive and use Sol to check plans. Helps usage stretch far for me.
展开原文
I do find it unnecessary for the model to referencing time so much in its outputs but it does flow in my experience so it hasnt really been a negative quirk
展开原文
it had no problem completely busting a comprehensive GLM 5.3 diagnosis for me 5 minutes ago to which GLM had to admit defeat lol
展开原文
With GLM 5.3, your setup would do worse than what you see in benchmarks, since you'd have to run a lower quant than what the benchmarks use.
展开原文
You can only fit GLM 5.3 in Q4, so I doubt it makes sense to trade that for full precision on DeepSeek.
展开原文
geometry and polygons were weak
展开原文
Both have objectively terrible staircases.
展开原文
5.3 Flash is awesome, actually feels like the next generation compared to the bigger 5.3.
展开原文
stick to models that can fit (+ their context windows) on RAM, Q4 GLM 5.3 or Q8 GLM 5.3 Flash might be better fits
展开原文
Switched back to GLM 5.3 exclusively but route any vision needs to Flash.
展开原文
Flash needs 192gb vram for nice inference and 5.3 fits same 192gb at nvfp4 (but tight)
近 7 天暂时没有符合此筛选条件的精选评论。